TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
科研立题论证评估方法探讨.

科研立题论证评估方法探讨.

 吴, 旭东.
 2013.
 tr. 681-691. 中文 ISSN: 10000429
Ngôn ngữ học实证研究.评估.Câu hỏi biện minh.Nghiên cứu thực nghiệm.Phương pháp đánh giá.科研立题.论证.
Tác giả CN 吴, 旭东.
Nhan đề dịch Assessing argumentation in research question justification: A preliminary study.
Nhan đề 科研立题论证评估方法探讨. / 吴旭东.
Thông tin xuất bản 2013.
Mô tả vật lý tr. 681-691.
Tóm tắt Research questions play a vital role throughout the process of scientific research, because they determine not only the what and the how of the research, but also their chances of success. Cur¬rent methods of research question assessment, however, mostly adopt externally-imposed criteria, which make assessment susceptible to the assessor’s bias, thus threatening the fairness of assess¬ment. To address the problem, the present study develops a special method for assessing argumen¬tation in research question justification. This is achieved by analyzing the features of argumentation in research question justification, drawing upon theories of argumentation. The steps followed are; (1) Based on the above-mentioned feature analysis of argumentation, identify the types of information that should be included when justifying research questions, and establish the relationship between the identified types of information. (2) On the basis of (1), specify what should be assessed and how by adapting the argument challenging questions proposed by Freeman (1991). (3) Operationalize the assessment by developing the Checklist for Assessing Ar-gumentation in Research Question Justification. The study ends with an explanation of how to use the Checklist, followed by suggestions for further research in this under-explored area.
Tóm tắt 研究问题是科研的关键,它不仅规定了研究的内容、手段和方法,还决定着研究的成败。目前对研究问题的评估主要依靠外部标准,容易受评估者个人观点的影响,无法保证评估结果的公平。为寻求更为客观的评估方法,本研究尝试从分析科研立题论证的特点入手,借鉴论证结构研究方面的理论,制定科研立题论证评估法。具体做法是:(1)在分析科研立题论证特点的基础上识别立题论证所需信息,建立信息之间的内在联系;(2)根据所需信息及其之间的关系,借鉴Freeman(1991)的论证逻辑质疑法,规定评估内容和制定评估步骤;(3)建立科研立题论证评估表,将评估方法操作化。文章最后介绍了评估表的使用方法,并对未来研究提出建议。
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Ngôn ngữ học-TVDHHN
Từ khóa tự do 实证研究.
Từ khóa tự do 评估.
Từ khóa tự do Câu hỏi biện minh.
Từ khóa tự do Nghiên cứu thực nghiệm.
Từ khóa tự do Phương pháp đánh giá.
Từ khóa tự do 科研立题.
Từ khóa tự do 论证.
Tác giả(bs) CN Wu, Xudong.
Nguồn trích Foreign language teaching and research.- 2013, Vol. 45, No.5.
Nguồn trích 外语教学与研究- 2013, 第45卷.第5期
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00132889
0022
00443262
005201812201441
008141210s2013 ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10000429
035[ ] |a 1456418012
039[ ] |a 20241202160620 |b idtocn |c 20181220144123 |d huongnt |y 20141210150451 |z ngant
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a 吴, 旭东.
242[0 ] |a Assessing argumentation in research question justification: A preliminary study. |y eng
245[1 0] |a 科研立题论证评估方法探讨. / |c 吴旭东.
260[ ] |c 2013.
300[ ] |a tr. 681-691.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 45, No. 5 (Sep. 2013)
520[ ] |a Research questions play a vital role throughout the process of scientific research, because they determine not only the what and the how of the research, but also their chances of success. Cur¬rent methods of research question assessment, however, mostly adopt externally-imposed criteria, which make assessment susceptible to the assessor’s bias, thus threatening the fairness of assess¬ment. To address the problem, the present study develops a special method for assessing argumen¬tation in research question justification. This is achieved by analyzing the features of argumentation in research question justification, drawing upon theories of argumentation. The steps followed are; (1) Based on the above-mentioned feature analysis of argumentation, identify the types of information that should be included when justifying research questions, and establish the relationship between the identified types of information. (2) On the basis of (1), specify what should be assessed and how by adapting the argument challenging questions proposed by Freeman (1991). (3) Operationalize the assessment by developing the Checklist for Assessing Ar-gumentation in Research Question Justification. The study ends with an explanation of how to use the Checklist, followed by suggestions for further research in this under-explored area.
520[ ] |a 研究问题是科研的关键,它不仅规定了研究的内容、手段和方法,还决定着研究的成败。目前对研究问题的评估主要依靠外部标准,容易受评估者个人观点的影响,无法保证评估结果的公平。为寻求更为客观的评估方法,本研究尝试从分析科研立题论证的特点入手,借鉴论证结构研究方面的理论,制定科研立题论证评估法。具体做法是:(1)在分析科研立题论证特点的基础上识别立题论证所需信息,建立信息之间的内在联系;(2)根据所需信息及其之间的关系,借鉴Freeman(1991)的论证逻辑质疑法,规定评估内容和制定评估步骤;(3)建立科研立题论证评估表,将评估方法操作化。文章最后介绍了评估表的使用方法,并对未来研究提出建议。
650[0 7] |a Ngôn ngữ học |2 TVDHHN
653[0 ] |a 实证研究.
653[0 ] |a 评估.
653[0 ] |a Câu hỏi biện minh.
653[0 ] |a Nghiên cứu thực nghiệm.
653[0 ] |a Phương pháp đánh giá.
653[0 ] |a 科研立题.
653[0 ] |a 论证.
700[0 ] |a Wu, Xudong.
773[ ] |t Foreign language teaching and research. |g 2013, Vol. 45, No.5.
773[ ] |t 外语教学与研究 |g 2013, 第45卷.第5期
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0