TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
德国博彩业中的国家垄断与竞争——由德国联邦宪法法院的体育博彩判例切入 =

德国博彩业中的国家垄断与竞争——由德国联邦宪法法院的体育博彩判例切入 = : A State Monopoly or a Laisser – faire Practice A Study of Germany’s Lottery Industry Based on the Sportwetten Case of German Federal Constitutional Court.

 ZHANG, Wei.
 2014
 tr. 46-54. 南京大学 中文 ISSN: 10077278
Betting state monopoly.Cartel law.Legitimacy of the Constitution.To prevent dangerous mode.博彩的国家垄断.卡特尔法.宪法正当性.防范危险模式.
Tác giả CN ZHANG, Wei.
Nhan đề 德国博彩业中的国家垄断与竞争——由德国联邦宪法法院的体育博彩判例切入 = A State Monopoly or a Laisser – faire Practice: A Study of Germany’s Lottery Industry Based on the Sportwetten Case of German Federal Constitutional Court. /ZHANG Wei.
Thông tin xuất bản 2014
Mô tả vật lý tr. 46-54.
Tùng thư 南京大学
Tóm tắt Liberalization of the German gaming market not only reflects the order requires each game and economic interests, but also reflects the public law as a carrier, the country s position by the European Community legislation and reality driven. German state monopoly means that the state gaming right to dispose of the asset value of the game of public access (betting), reflecting the state s gaming reservations and "regional gaming monopoly federal structure based on a high state of gaming right to form principle. "Judgment by sports betting, the German Federal Constitutional Court emphasized that: constitutional legitimacy based on national gaming monopoly in its appropriate means must be associated with the risk of a gambling confrontation. Therefore, in this series of proceedings throughout the concept is not possible under the gaming market regulation and reduce the degree of state intervention, it is important to prevent dangerous pattern in to strengthen the state monopoly the purpose of the constraints, but it reserves the right to limit the monopoly cartel competition law review in the area of its purely economic behavior.
Tóm tắt 德国博彩市场的自由化既反映了秩序要求与经济利益的相互博弈,也体现了以公法为载体、由欧洲共同体的立法和现实所推动的国家立场。德国博彩的国家垄断意味着国家对公共准入的资产价值游戏(博彩)的处置权,体现为国家的博彩保留以及基于联邦制结构和州对博彩的高权而形成博彩垄断上的"地区性原则"。通过体育博彩的判决,德国联邦宪法法院强调指出:博彩的国家垄断的宪法正当性依据在于其必须是一个与赌博相关的危险相对抗的适当手段。因此在这一系列的法律程序中,贯穿始终的理念并不是尽可能地把博彩业置于市场调控之下而降低国家干预的程度,重要的是在防范危险的模式下要加强对国家垄断的目的制约,而在其纯经济行为的领域则保留对垄断企业卡特尔法上竞争限制的审查。
Từ khóa tự do Betting state monopoly.
Từ khóa tự do Cartel law.
Từ khóa tự do Legitimacy of the Constitution.
Từ khóa tự do To prevent dangerous mode.
Từ khóa tự do 博彩的国家垄断.
Từ khóa tự do 卡特尔法.
Từ khóa tự do 宪法正当性.
Từ khóa tự do 防范危险模式.
Nguồn trích Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences- 2014, Vol. 51, No. 4.
Nguồn trích 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学- 2014, 第一卷
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000cab a2200000 a 4500
00133820
0022
00444227
008150513s2014 ch| a 000 0 chi d
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10077278
035[ ] |a 1456414511
039[ ] |a 20241202115959 |b idtocn |c 20150513165655 |d haont |y 20150513165655 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a ZHANG, Wei.
245[1 2] |a 德国博彩业中的国家垄断与竞争——由德国联邦宪法法院的体育博彩判例切入 = |b A State Monopoly or a Laisser – faire Practice: A Study of Germany’s Lottery Industry Based on the Sportwetten Case of German Federal Constitutional Court. / |c ZHANG Wei.
260[ ] |c 2014
300[ ] |a tr. 46-54.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 51, No. 4 (Apr. 2014)
490[0 ] |a 南京大学
520[ ] |a Liberalization of the German gaming market not only reflects the order requires each game and economic interests, but also reflects the public law as a carrier, the country s position by the European Community legislation and reality driven. German state monopoly means that the state gaming right to dispose of the asset value of the game of public access (betting), reflecting the state s gaming reservations and "regional gaming monopoly federal structure based on a high state of gaming right to form principle. "Judgment by sports betting, the German Federal Constitutional Court emphasized that: constitutional legitimacy based on national gaming monopoly in its appropriate means must be associated with the risk of a gambling confrontation. Therefore, in this series of proceedings throughout the concept is not possible under the gaming market regulation and reduce the degree of state intervention, it is important to prevent dangerous pattern in to strengthen the state monopoly the purpose of the constraints, but it reserves the right to limit the monopoly cartel competition law review in the area of its purely economic behavior.
520[ ] |a 德国博彩市场的自由化既反映了秩序要求与经济利益的相互博弈,也体现了以公法为载体、由欧洲共同体的立法和现实所推动的国家立场。德国博彩的国家垄断意味着国家对公共准入的资产价值游戏(博彩)的处置权,体现为国家的博彩保留以及基于联邦制结构和州对博彩的高权而形成博彩垄断上的"地区性原则"。通过体育博彩的判决,德国联邦宪法法院强调指出:博彩的国家垄断的宪法正当性依据在于其必须是一个与赌博相关的危险相对抗的适当手段。因此在这一系列的法律程序中,贯穿始终的理念并不是尽可能地把博彩业置于市场调控之下而降低国家干预的程度,重要的是在防范危险的模式下要加强对国家垄断的目的制约,而在其纯经济行为的领域则保留对垄断企业卡特尔法上竞争限制的审查。
653[0 ] |a Betting state monopoly.
653[0 ] |a Cartel law.
653[0 ] |a Legitimacy of the Constitution.
653[0 ] |a To prevent dangerous mode.
653[0 ] |a 博彩的国家垄断.
653[0 ] |a 卡特尔法.
653[0 ] |a 宪法正当性.
653[0 ] |a 防范危险模式.
773[ ] |t Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences |g 2014, Vol. 51, No. 4.
773[ ] |t 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 |g 2014, 第一卷
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0