TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
人力资本积累、变现与城市规模 =

人力资本积累、变现与城市规模 = : Accumulation and Liquidation of Human Capital and the Influence on Urban Size.

 GAO, Chun-liang.
 2014
 tr. 16-23. 南京大学 中文 ISSN: 10077278
Migration.规模经济.Economies of scale.City size.Resource scarcity.人口迁移.城市规模.源稀缺性.
Tác giả CN GAO, Chun-liang.
Nhan đề 人力资本积累、变现与城市规模 = Accumulation and Liquidation of Human Capital and the Influence on Urban Size. /GAO Chun-liang.
Thông tin xuất bản 2014
Mô tả vật lý tr. 16-23.
Tùng thư 南京大学
Tóm tắt China Population urbanization trend is clearly concentrated in large cities, urban congestion has become an important argument to limit migration, but the policy control can solve the problem of urban-scale expansion is still worth exploring. Migration theory, theory and agglomeration economies are voting with their feet theory can not explain why there are differences in the cities and towns. Based on the accumulation of cash scarcity of resources and human capital analysis framework shows that the scarcity of resources and the realization of human capital accumulation decision convenience, thereby enabling a large urban population concentration trend is difficult to change. Under conditions of scarcity of resources, the two approaches are possible by increasing the number of metropolitan cities slowed expansion and reduce resource scarcity through economic development, thus contributing to more cities to improve human capital accumulation and net realizable convenience.
Tóm tắt 中国城镇化进程中人口向大城市集中的趋势明显,城市拥挤成为限制人口流动的重要论据,但政策管制能否解决城市规模膨胀问题仍值得探讨。人口迁移理论、集聚经济理论和用脚投票理论均无法解释为什么存在大中小城市的差异。基于稀缺性资源和人力资本积累变现的分析框架表明,资源稀缺性决定人力资本积累和变现的便利性,进而使大城市人口集中的趋势难以改变。资源稀缺性条件下,可行的两个办法是通过增加大城市数量减缓大城市规模扩张和通过经济发展减少资源稀缺性,进而促进更多城市提高人力资本积累和变现便利程度。
Từ khóa tự do Migration.
Từ khóa tự do 规模经济.
Từ khóa tự do Economies of scale.
Từ khóa tự do City size.
Từ khóa tự do Resource scarcity.
Từ khóa tự do 人口迁移.
Từ khóa tự do 城市规模.
Từ khóa tự do 源稀缺性.
Nguồn trích Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences- 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3.
Nguồn trích 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学- 2014, 第一卷
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000cab a2200000 a 4500
00133837
0022
00444244
008150518s2014 ch| a 000 0 chi d
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10077278
035[ ] |a 1456397027
039[ ] |a 20241129092117 |b idtocn |c 20150518154937 |d ngant |y 20150518154937 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a GAO, Chun-liang.
245[1 0] |a 人力资本积累、变现与城市规模 = |b Accumulation and Liquidation of Human Capital and the Influence on Urban Size. / |c GAO Chun-liang.
260[ ] |c 2014
300[ ] |a tr. 16-23.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 51, No. 3 (Mar. 2014)
490[0 ] |a 南京大学
520[ ] |a China Population urbanization trend is clearly concentrated in large cities, urban congestion has become an important argument to limit migration, but the policy control can solve the problem of urban-scale expansion is still worth exploring. Migration theory, theory and agglomeration economies are voting with their feet theory can not explain why there are differences in the cities and towns. Based on the accumulation of cash scarcity of resources and human capital analysis framework shows that the scarcity of resources and the realization of human capital accumulation decision convenience, thereby enabling a large urban population concentration trend is difficult to change. Under conditions of scarcity of resources, the two approaches are possible by increasing the number of metropolitan cities slowed expansion and reduce resource scarcity through economic development, thus contributing to more cities to improve human capital accumulation and net realizable convenience.
520[ ] |a 中国城镇化进程中人口向大城市集中的趋势明显,城市拥挤成为限制人口流动的重要论据,但政策管制能否解决城市规模膨胀问题仍值得探讨。人口迁移理论、集聚经济理论和用脚投票理论均无法解释为什么存在大中小城市的差异。基于稀缺性资源和人力资本积累变现的分析框架表明,资源稀缺性决定人力资本积累和变现的便利性,进而使大城市人口集中的趋势难以改变。资源稀缺性条件下,可行的两个办法是通过增加大城市数量减缓大城市规模扩张和通过经济发展减少资源稀缺性,进而促进更多城市提高人力资本积累和变现便利程度。
653[0 ] |a Migration.
653[0 ] |a 规模经济.
653[0 ] |a Economies of scale.
653[0 ] |a City size.
653[0 ] |a Resource scarcity.
653[0 ] |a 人口迁移.
653[0 ] |a 城市规模.
653[0 ] |a 源稀缺性.
773[ ] |t Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences |g 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3.
773[ ] |t 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 |g 2014, 第一卷
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0