TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
北洋视角与近代史研究 =

北洋视角与近代史研究 = : A study of Modern History From the Perspective of Beiyang- Government Studies.

 TANG, Qi-hua.
 2014
 tr. 67-69. 南京大学 中文 ISSN: 10077278
Northern History.北洋史.Northern diplomacy.Northern perspective.北洋外交.北洋视角.
Tác giả CN TANG, Qi-hua.
Nhan đề 北洋视角与近代史研究 = A study of Modern History : From the Perspective of Beiyang- Government Studies. /LUO Zhi-tian.
Thông tin xuất bản 2014
Mô tả vật lý tr. 67-69.
Tùng thư 南京大学
Tóm tắt Chinese modern history research across the Taiwan Strait, were affected by the revolutionary party perspective, in recent years, some scholars have tried to "modernization paradigm" as a possible alternative choice, but because of their strong academic questioned by US-based colors. Maybe inclusive variety of context, understanding diverse perspectives, but also allows the modern history of research enrichment. If the perspective of 1895 to examine the modern history, from the late Qing Dynasty to the war, the Northern faction are important political, military, diplomatic power, even in terms of industry, justice, education, etc., are very important, many of the historical context of the continuity of this period may far more than the fracture. Northern period should not only be regarded as insignificant real transition period. If we can break past the north and south isolated opposition to the Northern and revolutionary view of history as opposed to competition, changing to north-south integration perspective to re-examine the history of the Republic of China, the history of the Republic of China may have realized that there are quite different. Northern perspective view of history had long been obscured revolution, priority should be publishing a historical Northern retain Northern perspective, to lay the foundation for the Northern Research Historical Archives.
Tóm tắt 台海两岸的中国近代史研究,均深受革命党视角影响,近年来,有学者试图以"现代化范式"作为替代的可能选择,却因其浓厚的美国化色彩受到学界质疑。也许包容多种脉络、多元化的理解视角,更可让近代史研究丰富化。若从北洋的视角来考察近代史,从清末到抗战,北洋派都是重要的政治、军事、外交力量,甚至在实业、司法、教育等方面,都举足轻重,这期间许多历史脉络的连续性可能远超过断裂性。北洋时期实不宜只被视为无足轻重的过渡时期。若能打破过去南北隔绝对立,以北洋与革命相对立竞争的史观,改以南北统合的视角来重新考查民国历史,可能会对民国史有相当不同的体悟。北洋视角过去长期被革命史观遮蔽,当务之急,应是刊布北洋史料,保留北洋视角,为北洋研究奠定档案史料的基础。
Từ khóa tự do Northern History.
Từ khóa tự do 北洋史.
Từ khóa tự do Northern diplomacy.
Từ khóa tự do Northern perspective.
Từ khóa tự do 北洋外交.
Từ khóa tự do 北洋视角.
Nguồn trích Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences- 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3.
Nguồn trích 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学- 2014, 第一卷
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000cab a2200000 a 4500
00133843
0022
00444250
008150518s2014 ch| a 000 0 chi d
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10077278
035[ ] |a 1456412079
039[ ] |a 20241129103916 |b idtocn |c 20150518165315 |d ngant |y 20150518165315 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a TANG, Qi-hua.
245[1 0] |a 北洋视角与近代史研究 = |b A study of Modern History : From the Perspective of Beiyang- Government Studies. / |c LUO Zhi-tian.
260[ ] |c 2014
300[ ] |a tr. 67-69.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 51, No. 3 (Mar. 2014)
490[0 ] |a 南京大学
520[ ] |a Chinese modern history research across the Taiwan Strait, were affected by the revolutionary party perspective, in recent years, some scholars have tried to "modernization paradigm" as a possible alternative choice, but because of their strong academic questioned by US-based colors. Maybe inclusive variety of context, understanding diverse perspectives, but also allows the modern history of research enrichment. If the perspective of 1895 to examine the modern history, from the late Qing Dynasty to the war, the Northern faction are important political, military, diplomatic power, even in terms of industry, justice, education, etc., are very important, many of the historical context of the continuity of this period may far more than the fracture. Northern period should not only be regarded as insignificant real transition period. If we can break past the north and south isolated opposition to the Northern and revolutionary view of history as opposed to competition, changing to north-south integration perspective to re-examine the history of the Republic of China, the history of the Republic of China may have realized that there are quite different. Northern perspective view of history had long been obscured revolution, priority should be publishing a historical Northern retain Northern perspective, to lay the foundation for the Northern Research Historical Archives.
520[ ] |a 台海两岸的中国近代史研究,均深受革命党视角影响,近年来,有学者试图以"现代化范式"作为替代的可能选择,却因其浓厚的美国化色彩受到学界质疑。也许包容多种脉络、多元化的理解视角,更可让近代史研究丰富化。若从北洋的视角来考察近代史,从清末到抗战,北洋派都是重要的政治、军事、外交力量,甚至在实业、司法、教育等方面,都举足轻重,这期间许多历史脉络的连续性可能远超过断裂性。北洋时期实不宜只被视为无足轻重的过渡时期。若能打破过去南北隔绝对立,以北洋与革命相对立竞争的史观,改以南北统合的视角来重新考查民国历史,可能会对民国史有相当不同的体悟。北洋视角过去长期被革命史观遮蔽,当务之急,应是刊布北洋史料,保留北洋视角,为北洋研究奠定档案史料的基础。
653[0 ] |a Northern History.
653[0 ] |a 北洋史.
653[0 ] |a Northern diplomacy.
653[0 ] |a Northern perspective.
653[0 ] |a 北洋外交.
653[0 ] |a 北洋视角.
773[ ] |t Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences |g 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3.
773[ ] |t 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 |g 2014, 第一卷
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0