TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
禅悟在跨文化语境下的理性解读——从胡适与铃木大拙关于禅宗的争论谈起 =

禅悟在跨文化语境下的理性解读——从胡适与铃木大拙关于禅宗的争论谈起 = : A Rational Understanding of Zen Enlightenment in the Cross-cultural Context A Study Initiated by the Hu Shi- Suzuki Debate.

 GUO, Jian-ping.
 2014
 124-134. 南京大学 中文 ISSN: 10077278
Meditation.胡适.Zen.Hu.Suzuki.Zen enlightenment.禅修.禅宗.+ 2 từ khóa
Tác giả CN GUO, Jian-ping.
Nhan đề 禅悟在跨文化语境下的理性解读——从胡适与铃木大拙关于禅宗的争论谈起 = A Rational Understanding of Zen Enlightenment in the Cross-cultural Context: A Study Initiated by the Hu Shi- Suzuki Debate. /GUO Jian-ping;GU Ming-dong.
Thông tin xuất bản 2014
Mô tả vật lý 124-134.
Tùng thư 南京大学
Tóm tắt A household word across cultures,Zen( or Chan in Chinese romanization) remains an ineffable oriental mysticism. Hu Shi and Suzuki once debated over whether Zen could be rationally interpreted,but did not come to any agreement. Citing the authentication of enlightenment in Zen training,this essay argues that the procedure provides strong evidence that Zen enlightenment can be intellectually understood. With a review of the debate between Hu Shi and Suzuki,we challenge the mystified view of enlightenment. By analyzing time-honored Zen practices that have led to enlightenment in history from the combined perspective of historical,philosophical,and psychological inquiries,we hope to shed light on the mystery.
Tóm tắt 在全球化时代,"禅"在世界范围内已广为人知,但禅至今仍是一种公论的不可言喻的东方神秘主义。关于禅能否被理性解读,胡适与铃木大拙曾在《东西方哲学》上展开一场争论,但未能达成共识。重温这场关于禅悟本质的论战,以禅宗弟子开悟需经已开悟的禅师检验其真伪为切入点,可以质疑禅悟神秘主义的共识。对被历代公认为通往禅悟必经之途的禅修进行深入探索,可以在跨文化语境下为理解禅悟的神秘本质获得一些理性洞见。在禅悟这种特殊的精神状态下,自我和他者的二元性被消解,人类的心智在有意识的思维层面短暂停止,从而暂时"消除"了写在心灵上的东西,即出生后逐渐积累的激动和刺激、欲望和渴望、痛苦和快乐、紧张和创伤等等。所谓顿悟是一种心灵境界,其中意识和无意识完全消失,人的思想暂时恢复到约翰•洛克(John Locke)所描述的白板(tabula rasa),也即庄子的"坐忘"。禅悟穿透弗洛伊德的"无意识",触及出生前的心理状态,堪称"前无意识"或"宇宙无意识"。
Từ khóa tự do Meditation.
Từ khóa tự do 胡适.
Từ khóa tự do Zen.
Từ khóa tự do Hu.
Từ khóa tự do Suzuki.
Từ khóa tự do Zen enlightenment.
Từ khóa tự do 禅修.
Từ khóa tự do 禅宗.
Từ khóa tự do 禅悟.
Từ khóa tự do 铃木大拙.
Tác giả(bs) CN GU, Ming-dong.
Nguồn trích Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences- 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3.
Nguồn trích 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学- 2014, 第一卷
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000cab a2200000 a 4500
00133850
0022
00444257
008150519s2014 ch| a 000 0 chi d
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10077278
035[ ] |a 1456382677
039[ ] |a 20241129102806 |b idtocn |c 20150519141331 |d haont |y 20150519141331 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a GUO, Jian-ping.
245[1 2] |a 禅悟在跨文化语境下的理性解读——从胡适与铃木大拙关于禅宗的争论谈起 = |b A Rational Understanding of Zen Enlightenment in the Cross-cultural Context: A Study Initiated by the Hu Shi- Suzuki Debate. / |c GUO Jian-ping;GU Ming-dong.
260[ ] |c 2014
300[ ] |a 124-134.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 51, No. 3 (Mar. 2014)
490[0 ] |a 南京大学
520[ ] |a A household word across cultures,Zen( or Chan in Chinese romanization) remains an ineffable oriental mysticism. Hu Shi and Suzuki once debated over whether Zen could be rationally interpreted,but did not come to any agreement. Citing the authentication of enlightenment in Zen training,this essay argues that the procedure provides strong evidence that Zen enlightenment can be intellectually understood. With a review of the debate between Hu Shi and Suzuki,we challenge the mystified view of enlightenment. By analyzing time-honored Zen practices that have led to enlightenment in history from the combined perspective of historical,philosophical,and psychological inquiries,we hope to shed light on the mystery.
520[ ] |a 在全球化时代,"禅"在世界范围内已广为人知,但禅至今仍是一种公论的不可言喻的东方神秘主义。关于禅能否被理性解读,胡适与铃木大拙曾在《东西方哲学》上展开一场争论,但未能达成共识。重温这场关于禅悟本质的论战,以禅宗弟子开悟需经已开悟的禅师检验其真伪为切入点,可以质疑禅悟神秘主义的共识。对被历代公认为通往禅悟必经之途的禅修进行深入探索,可以在跨文化语境下为理解禅悟的神秘本质获得一些理性洞见。在禅悟这种特殊的精神状态下,自我和他者的二元性被消解,人类的心智在有意识的思维层面短暂停止,从而暂时"消除"了写在心灵上的东西,即出生后逐渐积累的激动和刺激、欲望和渴望、痛苦和快乐、紧张和创伤等等。所谓顿悟是一种心灵境界,其中意识和无意识完全消失,人的思想暂时恢复到约翰•洛克(John Locke)所描述的白板(tabula rasa),也即庄子的"坐忘"。禅悟穿透弗洛伊德的"无意识",触及出生前的心理状态,堪称"前无意识"或"宇宙无意识"。
653[0 ] |a Meditation.
653[0 ] |a 胡适.
653[0 ] |a Zen.
653[0 ] |a Hu.
653[0 ] |a Suzuki.
653[0 ] |a Zen enlightenment.
653[0 ] |a 禅修.
653[0 ] |a 禅宗.
653[0 ] |a 禅悟.
653[0 ] |a 铃木大拙.
700[0 ] |a GU, Ming-dong.
773[ ] |t Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences |g 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3.
773[ ] |t 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 |g 2014, 第一卷
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0