| 000 | 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 34130 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 44542 |
|---|
| 005 | 202503281409 |
|---|
| 008 | 150609s ch| chi |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 022 | [ ] |a 16727320 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456376917 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20250328141132 |b namth |c 20241129102154 |d idtocn |y 20150609092004 |z svtt |
|---|
| 041 | [0 ] |a chi |
|---|
| 044 | [ ] |a ch |
|---|
| 100 | [0 ] |a 向, 逢春. |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a 让与担保与买回制度之比较研究. / |c 向逢春. |
|---|
| 300 | [ ] |a 57-61 p. |
|---|
| 362 | [0 ] |a Vol. 67, No. 1 (Jan. 2014) |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a For the regulation on security transfer,we must first know the status and role of security transfer,which needs to have comparison between security transfer and current laws of similar functions and similar systems,discovering the uniqueness and special role of transferring and security,to make clear our country the system of transferring guarantee development of value.Based on the two main Continental Law countries of Germany and Japan in the transferring guarantee and buying back,we further compare the real-life distinction of the transferring guarantee and buying back in the mainland of China,to reflect the unique advantages and features of transferring guarantee. |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a 对让与担保的规制,首先要明确让与担保的地位和作用,这就需要将让与担保与现行法中有相似或相近功能的制度进行比较,从中发掘出让与担保的独特个性与特殊作用,以明确我国让与担保制度发展之价值。通过对德日两个主要大陆法国家中让与担保与买回制度的比较,并进而对我国大陆地区让与担保与相关制度进行实务区分,以体现出让与担保的独特优势、功能,突显其存在之必要性。 |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 比较. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Comparison. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 让与担保. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Buying back. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Transfer guarantee. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 买回. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 规制. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Regulation. |
|---|
| 773 | [ ] |t Wuhan Universiy Journal. |g 2014, Vol. 67. |
|---|
| 773 | [ ] |t 武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2014, 第67卷. |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|