TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
纠错反馈与理解回应的实证研究 =

纠错反馈与理解回应的实证研究 = : A Study on Corrective Feedback and Uptake in Chinese Classroom.

 Hong, Yun.
 2013.
 p. 105-112. 中文 ISSN: 10037365
Corrective feedback.纠错反馈.Recast.Uptake.理解回应.
Tác giả CN Hong, Yun.
Nhan đề 纠错反馈与理解回应的实证研究 = A Study on Corrective Feedback and Uptake in Chinese Classroom. /Hong Yun.
Thông tin xuất bản 2013.
Mô tả vật lý p. 105-112.
Tóm tắt This article presents a study of corrective feedback and learner uptake in Chinese classroom at primary level.Transcripts were analyzed to compare the various moves in an error treatment sequence.Results includes the frequency and distribution of the six different feedback types used by the seven teachers,in addition to the frequency and distribution of different types of learner uptake following each feedback type.The findings indicate an overwhelming tendency for teachers to use recasts,but repetition and clarification requests lead to student-generated repair more successfully.
Tóm tắt 本文通过对国际汉语课堂教学的转写统计,重点考察课堂教学中教师纠错反馈与学生理解回应的某些规律,发现重复和澄清请求的理解回应率及学生自主修正率最高,教师对于纠错反馈方式的选择与学生水平有一定的对应关系,错误类型与纠错方式有一定对应关系,语音错误多采用重述类纠错方式,词汇错误多采用协商类纠错方式。
Từ khóa tự do Corrective feedback.
Từ khóa tự do 纠错反馈.
Từ khóa tự do Recast.
Từ khóa tự do Uptake.
Từ khóa tự do 理解回应.
Nguồn trích 漢語學習 = Chinese Language Learning (Hanyu Xuexi)- 2013, No.6.
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00134210
0022
00444643
005202007080947
008150612s2013 ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10037365
035[ ] |a 1456378244
039[ ] |a 20241202150906 |b idtocn |c 20200708094742 |d huongnt |y 20150612151017 |z ngant
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a Hong, Yun.
245[1 0] |a 纠错反馈与理解回应的实证研究 = |b A Study on Corrective Feedback and Uptake in Chinese Classroom. / |c Hong Yun.
260[ ] |c 2013.
300[ ] |a p. 105-112.
362[0 ] |a No. 6 (Dec. 2013)
520[ ] |a This article presents a study of corrective feedback and learner uptake in Chinese classroom at primary level.Transcripts were analyzed to compare the various moves in an error treatment sequence.Results includes the frequency and distribution of the six different feedback types used by the seven teachers,in addition to the frequency and distribution of different types of learner uptake following each feedback type.The findings indicate an overwhelming tendency for teachers to use recasts,but repetition and clarification requests lead to student-generated repair more successfully.
520[ ] |a 本文通过对国际汉语课堂教学的转写统计,重点考察课堂教学中教师纠错反馈与学生理解回应的某些规律,发现重复和澄清请求的理解回应率及学生自主修正率最高,教师对于纠错反馈方式的选择与学生水平有一定的对应关系,错误类型与纠错方式有一定对应关系,语音错误多采用重述类纠错方式,词汇错误多采用协商类纠错方式。
653[0 ] |a Corrective feedback.
653[0 ] |a 纠错反馈.
653[0 ] |a Recast.
653[0 ] |a Uptake.
653[0 ] |a 理解回应.
773[ ] |t 漢語學習 = Chinese Language Learning (Hanyu Xuexi) |g 2013, No.6.
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0