| 000 | 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 34219 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 44652 |
|---|
| 005 | 202007080951 |
|---|
| 008 | 150612s2013 ch| chi |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 022 | [ ] |a 10037365 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456403150 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241129132039 |b idtocn |c 20200708095128 |d huongnt |y 20150612155219 |z ngant |
|---|
| 041 | [0 ] |a chi |
|---|
| 044 | [ ] |a ch |
|---|
| 100 | [0 ] |a Xiong, Zhong-Ru. |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a 虚指宾语的句法地位 = |b The Syntactic Status of the Dummy Object. / |c Xiong Zhong-Ru. |
|---|
| 260 | [ ] |c 2013. |
|---|
| 300 | [ ] |a p 13-21. |
|---|
| 362 | [0 ] |a No. 5 (Oct. 2013) |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a The personal pronoun can be acted as a dummy object,but the object status is doubtable,for a normal object neither rejects aspect particles nor requires to co-occur with a number phrase.The pronoun is a determiner extending a number phrase as a demonstrative pronoun,so it must co-occur with a number phase.The pronoun shows affixal and must incorporate into the matrix verb,so the other phonological functional categories cannot affix to the verb.The pronoun cannot occur with a theme in the double object constructions,for it cannot incorporate into the verb. |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a 尽管一般认为人称代词可以充当虚指宾语,但其宾语地位是值得怀疑的,因为一般宾语并不排斥动态助词,也并不强制要求跟数量成分共现。其实,这种人称代词是限定范畴D,跟指示代词一样需要扩展数量成分,即与数量成分共现;它会强制性地跟动词融合,表现出粘着性,使得动词排斥动态助词与补语助词"得",也使得它不能出现于双宾句中的受事位置,因为该位置难以跟动词融合。 |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Personal pronoun. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Determiner. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Dummy object. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Syntactic incorporation. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 人称代词. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 句法融合. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 虚指宾语. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 限定范畴. |
|---|
| 773 | [ ] |t 漢語學習 = Chinese Language Learning (Hanyu Xuexi) |g 2013, No.5. |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|