TRA CỨU
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 =

关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 = : Institutional Analysis of “The Village Official Corruption”——A Question of Social Autonomy

 20-30 p. 中文 ISSN: 16727320
Tác giả CN 周, 庆智.
Nhan đề 关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 = Institutional Analysis of “The Village Official Corruption”——A Question of Social Autonomy /周庆智.
Mô tả vật lý 20-30 p.
Tóm tắt Is the corruption of village cadre a social problem,or institutional one?The discussion of the corruption of village official actually confused an essential issue:village official is not really official at all,who is a member of autonomous community of the society,at least in law.In another words,his corruption is resulted from that he is at juncture of two systems,which is state administrative one and society autonomous one.In addition,the genesis of his corruption is the paradox of the governing logic of present institution,and the disorder of the normal relationship between state power and society right.The corruption of village official signifies the power conflict of‘official governing’and social autonomy,the former is based on state power and the latter society one.The key to clamp down the corruption of village official is to differentiate administrative power and autonomous right,fixing the principle of society autonomy by rule of law.
Tóm tắt 对村官腐败的讨论混淆了一个实质性问题:村官不是官,他是社会自治体的成员,至少法理上如此。换言之,他的腐败恰好是因其身处两个体制——国家行政体系与社会自治体系之交界处,而且他腐败的根源恰好是现行体制治理逻辑的自相矛盾和国家与社会之间权利关系的规范失序。在腐败的村官身上体现的是官治与民治的权力冲突,前者基于的原则是国家权力,后者基于的原则是自治体的自治性与社会权力。防止村官腐败,关键是将村官双重代理身份剥离,将行政权与自治权做出区隔,并把社会自治以法治的原则确定并规范下来。
Từ khóa tự do 村官
Từ khóa tự do 国家与社会关系.
Từ khóa tự do administrative power and autonomous right
Từ khóa tự do relationship between state and society.
Từ khóa tự do social autonomy
Từ khóa tự do village official
Từ khóa tự do 社会自治
Từ khóa tự do 行政权与自治权
Nguồn trích Wuhan Universiy Journal.- 2015, Vol. 68.
Nguồn trích 武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2015, 第68卷.-
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00136679
0022
00447139
008160121s ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 16727320
035[ ] |a 1456412658
039[ ] |a 20241130170603 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160121143540 |z ngant
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a 周, 庆智.
245[1 0] |a 关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 = |b Institutional Analysis of “The Village Official Corruption”——A Question of Social Autonomy / |c 周庆智.
300[ ] |a 20-30 p.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 68, (Jan. 2015)
520[ ] |a Is the corruption of village cadre a social problem,or institutional one?The discussion of the corruption of village official actually confused an essential issue:village official is not really official at all,who is a member of autonomous community of the society,at least in law.In another words,his corruption is resulted from that he is at juncture of two systems,which is state administrative one and society autonomous one.In addition,the genesis of his corruption is the paradox of the governing logic of present institution,and the disorder of the normal relationship between state power and society right.The corruption of village official signifies the power conflict of‘official governing’and social autonomy,the former is based on state power and the latter society one.The key to clamp down the corruption of village official is to differentiate administrative power and autonomous right,fixing the principle of society autonomy by rule of law.
520[ ] |a 对村官腐败的讨论混淆了一个实质性问题:村官不是官,他是社会自治体的成员,至少法理上如此。换言之,他的腐败恰好是因其身处两个体制——国家行政体系与社会自治体系之交界处,而且他腐败的根源恰好是现行体制治理逻辑的自相矛盾和国家与社会之间权利关系的规范失序。在腐败的村官身上体现的是官治与民治的权力冲突,前者基于的原则是国家权力,后者基于的原则是自治体的自治性与社会权力。防止村官腐败,关键是将村官双重代理身份剥离,将行政权与自治权做出区隔,并把社会自治以法治的原则确定并规范下来。
653[0 ] |a 村官
653[0 ] |a 国家与社会关系.
653[0 ] |a administrative power and autonomous right
653[0 ] |a relationship between state and society.
653[0 ] |a social autonomy
653[0 ] |a village official
653[0 ] |a 社会自治
653[0 ] |a 行政权与自治权
773[ ] |t Wuhan Universiy Journal. |g 2015, Vol. 68.
773[ ] |t 武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2015, 第68卷.
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0