TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 =

关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 = : Institutional Analysis of “The Village Official Corruption”——A Question of Social Autonomy

 周, 庆智.
 双月, 2015
 湖北省武汉市 : 20-30 p. 中文 ISSN: 16727320
Administrative power and autonomous rightRelationship between state and societySocial autonomyVillage official村官国家与社会关系社会自治行政权与自治权
Tác giả CN 周, 庆智.
Nhan đề 关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 = Institutional Analysis of “The Village Official Corruption”——A Question of Social Autonomy /周庆智.
Thông tin xuất bản 湖北省武汉市 :双月,2015
Mô tả vật lý 20-30 p.
Tóm tắt Is the corruption of village cadre a social problem,or institutional one?The discussion of the corruption of village official actually confused an essential issue:village official is not really official at all,who is a member of autonomous community of the society,at least in law.In another words,his corruption is resulted from that he is at juncture of two systems,which is state administrative one and society autonomous one.In addition,the genesis of his corruption is the paradox of the governing logic of present institution,and the disorder of the normal relationship between state power and society right.The corruption of village official signifies the power conflict of‘official governing’and social autonomy,the former is based on state power and the latter society one.The key to clamp down the corruption of village official is to differentiate administrative power and autonomous right,fixing the principle of society autonomy by rule of law.
Tóm tắt 对村官腐败的讨论混淆了一个实质性问题:村官不是官,他是社会自治体的成员,至少法理上如此。换言之,他的腐败恰好是因其身处两个体制——国家行政体系与社会自治体系之交界处,而且他腐败的根源恰好是现行体制治理逻辑的自相矛盾和国家与社会之间权利关系的规范失序。在腐败的村官身上体现的是官治与民治的权力冲突,前者基于的原则是国家权力,后者基于的原则是自治体的自治性与社会权力。防止村官腐败,关键是将村官双重代理身份剥离,将行政权与自治权做出区隔,并把社会自治以法治的原则确定并规范下来.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Administrative power and autonomous right
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Relationship between state and society
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Social autonomy
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Village official
Từ khóa tự do 村官
Từ khóa tự do 国家与社会关系
Từ khóa tự do 社会自治
Từ khóa tự do 行政权与自治权
Nguồn trích Wuhan University Journal(Philosophy & Social Sciences)- Vol 68, No.3 (2015).
Tệp tin điện tử
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00137099
0022
00447561
008160301s2015 ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 16727320
035[ ] |a 1456402202
039[ ] |a 20241202135145 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160301085505 |z hangctt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[1 ] |a 周, 庆智.
245[1 0] |a 关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 = |b Institutional Analysis of “The Village Official Corruption”——A Question of Social Autonomy / |c 周庆智.
260[ ] |a 湖北省武汉市 : |b 双月, |c 2015
300[ ] |a 20-30 p.
362[ ] |a Vol. 68, no.3,2015
520[ ] |a Is the corruption of village cadre a social problem,or institutional one?The discussion of the corruption of village official actually confused an essential issue:village official is not really official at all,who is a member of autonomous community of the society,at least in law.In another words,his corruption is resulted from that he is at juncture of two systems,which is state administrative one and society autonomous one.In addition,the genesis of his corruption is the paradox of the governing logic of present institution,and the disorder of the normal relationship between state power and society right.The corruption of village official signifies the power conflict of‘official governing’and social autonomy,the former is based on state power and the latter society one.The key to clamp down the corruption of village official is to differentiate administrative power and autonomous right,fixing the principle of society autonomy by rule of law.
520[ ] |a 对村官腐败的讨论混淆了一个实质性问题:村官不是官,他是社会自治体的成员,至少法理上如此。换言之,他的腐败恰好是因其身处两个体制——国家行政体系与社会自治体系之交界处,而且他腐败的根源恰好是现行体制治理逻辑的自相矛盾和国家与社会之间权利关系的规范失序。在腐败的村官身上体现的是官治与民治的权力冲突,前者基于的原则是国家权力,后者基于的原则是自治体的自治性与社会权力。防止村官腐败,关键是将村官双重代理身份剥离,将行政权与自治权做出区隔,并把社会自治以法治的原则确定并规范下来.
650[0 0] |a Administrative power and autonomous right
650[0 0] |a Relationship between state and society
650[0 0] |a Social autonomy
650[0 0] |a Village official
653[0 ] |a 村官
653[0 ] |a 国家与社会关系
653[0 ] |a 社会自治
653[0 ] |a 行政权与自治权
773[0 ] |t Wuhan University Journal(Philosophy & Social Sciences) |g Vol 68, No.3 (2015).
856[4 ] |d http://eng.oversea.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=WSLD201406011&DBName=cjfqtotal&dbcode=cjfq
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0