Thời gian phục vụ
Thứ Hai - Thứ Sáu: 07h30 - 22h00
Thứ Bảy: 07h30 - 17h00
TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
食品安全私人执法研究——以惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼为中心 =

食品安全私人执法研究——以惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼为中心 = : Study on Private Enforcement of Food Safety

 黄, 忠顺.
 双月, 2015
 湖北省武汉市 : 84-92 p. 中文 ISSN: 16727320
Punitive damagesConsumer public interest litigationFood safetyPrivate enforcement食品安全惩罚性赔偿消费公益诉讼私人执法
Tác giả CN 黄, 忠顺.
Nhan đề 食品安全私人执法研究——以惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼为中心 = Study on Private Enforcement of Food Safety /黄忠顺.
Thông tin xuất bản 湖北省武汉市 :双月,2015
Mô tả vật lý 84-92 p.
Tóm tắt Public enforcement system has been strengthened in the new"Food Safety Law",while private enforcement system has not yet attracted the attention of legislators.As private enforcement performs indispensable and complementary functions,we should strengthen the system construction of the consumer public interest litigation through judicial interpretation.Consumer public interest litigation for punitive damages makes operators’ external costs and consumers’ positive externality internalized and reduces the incentive cost of private enforcement.In order to have the scale effect of punitive damages litigation realized,consumers might transfer both compensatory and punitive claims to some consumers’ association with qualification to file public interest litigation.
Tóm tắt 新《食品安全法》全面强化公共执法,但私人执法尚未引起立法者的足够重视。鉴于食品安全私人执法对公共执法具有不可或缺的监督和补充功能,应当从解释论层面强化消费公益诉讼制度建设。惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼具有内部化生产经营者外部成本、内在化消费者私人执法正外部性、利用消费者及其保护组织的隐性收益降低私人执法激励成本等多重价值。为实现惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼的规模效应,消费者得将其损害赔偿请求权概括性移转给具备提起公益诉讼主体资格的消费者协会.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Punitive damages
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Consumer public interest litigation
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Food safety
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Private enforcement
Từ khóa tự do 食品安全
Từ khóa tự do 惩罚性赔偿
Từ khóa tự do 消费公益诉讼
Từ khóa tự do 私人执法
Nguồn trích Wuhan University Journal(Philosophy & Social Sciences)- Vol 68, No.4 (2015).
Tệp tin điện tử
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00137144
0022
00447606
008160301s2015 ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 16727320
035[ ] |a 1456416703
039[ ] |a 20241129132839 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160301105022 |z ngant
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[1 ] |a 黄, 忠顺.
245[1 0] |a 食品安全私人执法研究——以惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼为中心 = |b Study on Private Enforcement of Food Safety / |c 黄忠顺.
260[ ] |a 湖北省武汉市 : |b 双月, |c 2015
300[ ] |a 84-92 p.
362[ ] |a Vol. 68, no.4,2015
520[ ] |a Public enforcement system has been strengthened in the new"Food Safety Law",while private enforcement system has not yet attracted the attention of legislators.As private enforcement performs indispensable and complementary functions,we should strengthen the system construction of the consumer public interest litigation through judicial interpretation.Consumer public interest litigation for punitive damages makes operators’ external costs and consumers’ positive externality internalized and reduces the incentive cost of private enforcement.In order to have the scale effect of punitive damages litigation realized,consumers might transfer both compensatory and punitive claims to some consumers’ association with qualification to file public interest litigation.
520[ ] |a 新《食品安全法》全面强化公共执法,但私人执法尚未引起立法者的足够重视。鉴于食品安全私人执法对公共执法具有不可或缺的监督和补充功能,应当从解释论层面强化消费公益诉讼制度建设。惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼具有内部化生产经营者外部成本、内在化消费者私人执法正外部性、利用消费者及其保护组织的隐性收益降低私人执法激励成本等多重价值。为实现惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼的规模效应,消费者得将其损害赔偿请求权概括性移转给具备提起公益诉讼主体资格的消费者协会.
650[0 0] |a Punitive damages
650[0 0] |a Consumer public interest litigation
650[0 0] |a Food safety
650[0 0] |a Private enforcement
653[0 ] |a 食品安全
653[0 ] |a 惩罚性赔偿
653[0 ] |a 消费公益诉讼
653[0 ] |a 私人执法
773[0 ] |t Wuhan University Journal(Philosophy & Social Sciences) |g Vol 68, No.4 (2015).
856[4 ] |d http://eng.oversea.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=WSLD201406011&DBName=cjfqtotal&dbcode=cjfq
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0
LegoWeb Comment