TRA CỨU
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting

The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting

 Routledge, Taylor & Francis , 2015.
 London, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales] Abingdon, UK : pages 620-650. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. English ISSN: 00014788
Tác giả CN Moraa, Araceli.
Nhan đề The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting / Araceli Moraa & Martin Walker.
Thông tin xuất bản London, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales] Abingdon, UK :Routledge, Taylor & Francis ,2015.
Mô tả vật lý pages 620-650.
Tùng thư Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
Tóm tắt This paper provides a commentary on the academic literature on accounting conservatism with a view to highlighting the insights of that literature that are potentially useful for accounting standard setters. We begin by introducing the basic concepts of conservatism focusing on the distinction between conditional and unconditional conservatism. We then briefly discuss the objectives of financial reporting and the economics of information, paying particular attention to the role of stewardship in the Conceptual Framework, and the economic concepts of adverse selection and moral hazard. The two middle sections of the paper provide overviews of, respectively, the theoretical and empirical literatures on accounting conservatism. Having summarised the theoretical and empirical literatures, we then try to synthesis the implications of the literature for standard setters, paying particular attention to understanding the costs and benefits of conservatism, implications for the Conceptual Framework, highlighting the particular demands of public debt markets for conservatism, and explaining how accounting standards might be adapted to allow some degree of flexibility in conservative accounting choice. The final section discusses the limitations of the academic literature from the practical point of view of standard setters, and highlights areas for new research that may be of more direct value for policy-making.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Accounting-Periodicals
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Business-Periodicals.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Accounting-Research-Periodicals
Từ khóa tự do Accounting conservatism
Từ khóa tự do Adverse selection
Từ khóa tự do Conceptual framework
Từ khóa tự do Contracting efficiency
Từ khóa tự do Moral hazard
Từ khóa tự do Prudence
Tác giả(bs) CN Walker, Martin.
Nguồn trích Accounting and Business Research.- Volume 45, N5, 2015.
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000cab a2200000 a 4500
00137482
0022
00447946
008160304s2015 enk eng
0091 0
022[ ] |a 00014788
035[ ] |a 1456364058
039[ ] |a 20241208232429 |b idtocn |c 20160304101808 |d ngant |y 20160304101808 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a eng
044[ ] |a enk
100[1 ] |a Moraa, Araceli.
245[1 0] |a The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting / |c Araceli Moraa & Martin Walker.
260[ ] |a London, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales] Abingdon, UK : |b Routledge, Taylor & Francis , |c 2015.
300[ ] |a pages 620-650.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 45, N.5 (2015)
490[ ] |a Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
520[ ] |a This paper provides a commentary on the academic literature on accounting conservatism with a view to highlighting the insights of that literature that are potentially useful for accounting standard setters. We begin by introducing the basic concepts of conservatism focusing on the distinction between conditional and unconditional conservatism. We then briefly discuss the objectives of financial reporting and the economics of information, paying particular attention to the role of stewardship in the Conceptual Framework, and the economic concepts of adverse selection and moral hazard. The two middle sections of the paper provide overviews of, respectively, the theoretical and empirical literatures on accounting conservatism. Having summarised the theoretical and empirical literatures, we then try to synthesis the implications of the literature for standard setters, paying particular attention to understanding the costs and benefits of conservatism, implications for the Conceptual Framework, highlighting the particular demands of public debt markets for conservatism, and explaining how accounting standards might be adapted to allow some degree of flexibility in conservative accounting choice. The final section discusses the limitations of the academic literature from the practical point of view of standard setters, and highlights areas for new research that may be of more direct value for policy-making.
650[0 0] |a Accounting |v Periodicals
650[0 0] |a Business |v Periodicals.
650[1 0] |a Accounting |x Research |v Periodicals
653[0 ] |a Accounting conservatism
653[0 ] |a Adverse selection
653[0 ] |a Conceptual framework
653[0 ] |a Contracting efficiency
653[0 ] |a Moral hazard
653[0 ] |a Prudence
700[1 ] |a Walker, Martin.
773[ ] |t Accounting and Business Research. |g Volume 45, N5, 2015.
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0