TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
西周与严复以学问观、道德观为中心=Nishi Amane and Yan FuOn Their Views of Knowledge and Morals

西周与严复以学问观、道德观为中心=Nishi Amane and Yan FuOn Their Views of Knowledge and Morals

 高柳信夫, 顾长江.
 2015.
 86-97+156 p. 南京大学 中文 ISSN: 10077278
严复学问观西周道德观.
Tác giả CN 高柳信夫, 顾长江.
Nhan đề 西周与严复:以学问观、道德观为中心=Nishi Amane and Yan Fu:On Their Views of Knowledge and Morals / 高柳信夫, 顾长江.
Thông tin xuất bản 2015.
Mô tả vật lý 86-97+156 p.
Tùng thư 南京大学
Tóm tắt 在东亚思想史上,西周与严复的角色具有一定的相似性。在近代东亚知识体系的转型过程中,二者在积极译介西方近代诸学说之际,均未全盘舍弃儒家文化。非但如此,二者不约而同地在自身的东亚传统学问背景下有意识或无意识地对西方学说进行了选择性书写。在学问观方面,西周与严复皆认为西方诸学说的优越性在于其具备体系性,但二者的理解也存在差异,前者强调知识体系由"诸学"构成,而后者则将该体系置于一"学"之名下。在道德观方面,西周认为要保证个人追逐私利的同时兼顾道德规范,必须依靠对"主宰(天、上帝)"的"信"来实现;而严复则认为,道德的基础由人类的"利己性"奠定,除此以外不需要任何形式的、具有超然性质的事物。
Tóm tắt In the intellectual history of East Asia,there are some similarities between the roles played by Nishi Amane and Yan Fu.In the process of transition to modern knowledge systems in East Asia,both of them actively introduced modern Western theories,yet without rejecting Confucian culture completely.Coincidentally,both selectively wrote about Western theories,consciously or unconsciously,against the background of their own traditional East Asian knowledge.Both considered Western theories superior for their being systematic.However,there are also differences in their understanding:Nishi Amane emphasized that the system of knowledge was constituted by"all studies"
Từ khóa tự do 严复
Từ khóa tự do 学问观
Từ khóa tự do 西周
Từ khóa tự do 道德观.
Nguồn trích Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences- 2015, Vol. 52, No. 6.
Nguồn trích 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学- 2015, 第4卷
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00140360
0022
00450886
008160610s2015 ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10077278
035[ ] |a 1456388008
039[ ] |a 20241201162407 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160610160409 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a 高柳信夫, 顾长江.
245[1 0] |a 西周与严复:以学问观、道德观为中心=Nishi Amane and Yan Fu:On Their Views of Knowledge and Morals / |c 高柳信夫, 顾长江.
260[ ] |c 2015.
300[ ] |a 86-97+156 p.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 52, No. 6 (2015)
490[0 ] |a 南京大学
520[ ] |a 在东亚思想史上,西周与严复的角色具有一定的相似性。在近代东亚知识体系的转型过程中,二者在积极译介西方近代诸学说之际,均未全盘舍弃儒家文化。非但如此,二者不约而同地在自身的东亚传统学问背景下有意识或无意识地对西方学说进行了选择性书写。在学问观方面,西周与严复皆认为西方诸学说的优越性在于其具备体系性,但二者的理解也存在差异,前者强调知识体系由"诸学"构成,而后者则将该体系置于一"学"之名下。在道德观方面,西周认为要保证个人追逐私利的同时兼顾道德规范,必须依靠对"主宰(天、上帝)"的"信"来实现;而严复则认为,道德的基础由人类的"利己性"奠定,除此以外不需要任何形式的、具有超然性质的事物。
520[ ] |a In the intellectual history of East Asia,there are some similarities between the roles played by Nishi Amane and Yan Fu.In the process of transition to modern knowledge systems in East Asia,both of them actively introduced modern Western theories,yet without rejecting Confucian culture completely.Coincidentally,both selectively wrote about Western theories,consciously or unconsciously,against the background of their own traditional East Asian knowledge.Both considered Western theories superior for their being systematic.However,there are also differences in their understanding:Nishi Amane emphasized that the system of knowledge was constituted by"all studies"
653[0 ] |a 严复
653[0 ] |a 学问观
653[0 ] |a 西周
653[0 ] |a 道德观.
773[ ] |t Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences |g 2015, Vol. 52, No. 6.
773[ ] |t 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 |g 2015, 第4卷
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0