TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
我国公益诉讼原告制度的现实考察与应然变革=A Survey of China’s Public-interest Litigation Plaintiff SystemIts Reality and Reform

我国公益诉讼原告制度的现实考察与应然变革=A Survey of China’s Public-interest Litigation Plaintiff SystemIts Reality and Reform

 高志宏.
 2016.
 73-80+159 p. 南京大学 中文 ISSN: 10077278
公共利益公益诉讼原告资格司法保护
Tác giả CN 高志宏.
Nhan đề 我国公益诉讼原告制度的现实考察与应然变革=A Survey of China’s Public-interest Litigation Plaintiff System:Its Reality and Reform / 高志宏.
Thông tin xuất bản 2016.
Mô tả vật lý 73-80+159 p.
Tùng thư 南京大学
Tóm tắt There is much absurdity in China’s preliminary public-interest litigation system.As far as plaintiff qualification is concerned,consideration must be shown for its authoritativeness and representativeness,and efficiency of the system.China should learn from international practices,and expand the body of the public interest litigation plaintiff,so that public prosecutors,social organizations and citizens are entitled to have public-interest litigation.However,to avoid any abuse of public-interest litigation,it is public prosecutors and social organizations,rather than individuals that should be given the fast priority in acquiring public-interest litigation plaintiff qualification.Laws should be amended and judicial interpretations should be made,so that further improvement can be made in the public-interest litigation plaintiff system.
Tóm tắt 我国已初步建立了公益诉讼制度,但在公益诉讼主体方面还存在诸多不合理之处。确定公益诉讼原告资格范围应当考虑该主体代表的权威性、广泛性以及司法资源的高效性等因素。我国应借鉴国际通行做法,扩大公益诉讼原告主体,赋予检察机关、社会组织和公民企业都享有公益诉讼起诉权。但是,为了避免社会个体滥用公益诉讼诉权,应赋予检察机关主要的和第一顺位的公益诉讼原告资格,赋予社会组织第一顺位的公益诉讼原告资格,赋予社会个体次要的和第二顺位的公益诉讼原告资格。应通过法律修改或者司法解释,进一步完善公益诉讼原告制度,构建我国健全的公益诉讼制度体系。
Từ khóa tự do 公共利益
Từ khóa tự do 公益诉讼
Từ khóa tự do 原告资格
Từ khóa tự do 司法保护
Nguồn trích Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences- 2016, Vol. 53, No. 2.
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00140433
0022
00450959
008160615s2016 ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10077278
035[ ] |a 1456398314
039[ ] |a 20241130171120 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160615094550 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a 高志宏.
245[1 0] |a 我国公益诉讼原告制度的现实考察与应然变革=A Survey of China’s Public-interest Litigation Plaintiff System:Its Reality and Reform / |c 高志宏.
260[ ] |c 2016.
300[ ] |a 73-80+159 p.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 53, No. 2 (2016)
490[0 ] |a 南京大学
520[ ] |a There is much absurdity in China’s preliminary public-interest litigation system.As far as plaintiff qualification is concerned,consideration must be shown for its authoritativeness and representativeness,and efficiency of the system.China should learn from international practices,and expand the body of the public interest litigation plaintiff,so that public prosecutors,social organizations and citizens are entitled to have public-interest litigation.However,to avoid any abuse of public-interest litigation,it is public prosecutors and social organizations,rather than individuals that should be given the fast priority in acquiring public-interest litigation plaintiff qualification.Laws should be amended and judicial interpretations should be made,so that further improvement can be made in the public-interest litigation plaintiff system.
520[ ] |a 我国已初步建立了公益诉讼制度,但在公益诉讼主体方面还存在诸多不合理之处。确定公益诉讼原告资格范围应当考虑该主体代表的权威性、广泛性以及司法资源的高效性等因素。我国应借鉴国际通行做法,扩大公益诉讼原告主体,赋予检察机关、社会组织和公民企业都享有公益诉讼起诉权。但是,为了避免社会个体滥用公益诉讼诉权,应赋予检察机关主要的和第一顺位的公益诉讼原告资格,赋予社会组织第一顺位的公益诉讼原告资格,赋予社会个体次要的和第二顺位的公益诉讼原告资格。应通过法律修改或者司法解释,进一步完善公益诉讼原告制度,构建我国健全的公益诉讼制度体系。
653[0 ] |a 公共利益
653[0 ] |a 公益诉讼
653[0 ] |a 原告资格
653[0 ] |a 司法保护
773[ ] |t Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences |g 2016, Vol. 53, No. 2.
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0