| 000 | 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 40722 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 51262 |
|---|
| 005 | 202007031456 |
|---|
| 008 | 160816s | a 000 0 eng d |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456367185 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456367185 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241209092046 |b idtocn |c 20241209004247 |d idtocn |y 20160816140603 |z khiembt |
|---|
| 041 | [ 0] |a eng |
|---|
| 100 | [ 1] |a Turner, Marianne. |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a Using student co-regulation to address L2 student’ language and pedagogical needs in university support classes / |c Marianne Turner |
|---|
| 300 | [ ] |a p251 - p266 |
|---|
| 362 | [ ] |a Vol 24, No3, (May 2010) |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a This article highlights student co-regulation of teaching practices as a way of exploring how L2 student’ language and pedagogical needs can be met in university support classes. Integtation rather than assimilation – or adapting to the needs of students rather than leaving students to face the exigencies of the new learning environment alone – is the forcus of the article. Data are taken from a qualitative study of Sudanese former refugees attending an Autralian universiti. In this study it was found that teachers used their authoritative position to adapt their teaching to the students’ apparent needs to deffering degrees. Students benefitted from some modifications in teaching practices, but their ambivalent reactions to discussion-based teaching, in particular, proved to be an obstacsle to their learning in the support classes |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Integration. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Positionality. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Student support. |
|---|
| 653 | [ 0] |a Co-regulation. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Adaptation. |
|---|
| 773 | [ ] |t Language and education |g Vol 24, No3, (May 2010) |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|