TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu

 Kumaravadivelu, B.
 p66-p85 English
Ngôn ngữ
Tác giả CN Kumaravadivelu, B.
Nhan đề / B. Kumaravadivelu
Mô tả vật lý p66-p85
Tóm tắt In this reflective article that straddles the personal and the professional, the author shares his critical thoughts on the impact of the steady stream of discourse on the native speaker/nonnative speaker (NS/NNS) inequity in the field of TESOL. His contention is that more than a quarter century of the discoursal output has not in any significant way altered the ground reality of NNS subordination. Therefore, he further contends, it is legitimate to ask what the discourse has achieved, where it has fallen short, why it has fallen short, and what needs to be done. Drawing insights from the works of Gramsci (1971) on hegemony and subalternity, and Mignolo (2010) on decoloniality, the author characterizes the NNS community as a subaltern community and argues that, if it wishes to effectively disrupt the hegemonic power structure, the only option open to it is a decolonial option which demands result-oriented action, not just “intellectual elaboration.” Accordingly, he presents the contours of a five-point plan of action for the consideration of the subaltern community. He claims that only a collective, concerted, and coordinated set of actions carries the potential to shake the foundation of the hegemonic power structure and move the subaltern community forward
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Ngôn ngữ-Giảng dạy-TV ĐHHN
Nguồn trích Tesol quarterly- 2016, Vol50, N.1
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00140826
0022
00451389
008160830s | a 000 0 eng d
0091 0
035[ ] |a 1456369606
039[ ] |a 20241209105601 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160830104214 |z khiembt
041[ 0] |a eng
100[ 1] |a Kumaravadivelu, B.
245[1 0] |a / |c B. Kumaravadivelu
300[ ] |a p66-p85
362[ 0] |a Vol 50 (March 2016)
520[ ] |a In this reflective article that straddles the personal and the professional, the author shares his critical thoughts on the impact of the steady stream of discourse on the native speaker/nonnative speaker (NS/NNS) inequity in the field of TESOL. His contention is that more than a quarter century of the discoursal output has not in any significant way altered the ground reality of NNS subordination. Therefore, he further contends, it is legitimate to ask what the discourse has achieved, where it has fallen short, why it has fallen short, and what needs to be done. Drawing insights from the works of Gramsci (1971) on hegemony and subalternity, and Mignolo (2010) on decoloniality, the author characterizes the NNS community as a subaltern community and argues that, if it wishes to effectively disrupt the hegemonic power structure, the only option open to it is a decolonial option which demands result-oriented action, not just “intellectual elaboration.” Accordingly, he presents the contours of a five-point plan of action for the consideration of the subaltern community. He claims that only a collective, concerted, and coordinated set of actions carries the potential to shake the foundation of the hegemonic power structure and move the subaltern community forward
650[1 7] |a Ngôn ngữ |x Giảng dạy |2 TV ĐHHN
773[ 0] |t Tesol quarterly |g 2016, Vol50, N.1
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0