| 000 | 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 41103 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 51685 |
|---|
| 008 | 160915s | a 000 0 chi d |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456385777 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241202132354 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160915160345 |z khiembt |
|---|
| 041 | [ 0] |a chi |
|---|
| 100 | [ 0] |a Wang, Guangrong. |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a Two Research Paradigms of Developmental Psychology——Comparison between Piaget and Vygotsky on Theories of Cognitive Development / |c Wang Guangrong. |
|---|
| 300 | [ ] |a p164-p169 |
|---|
| 362 | [ 0] |a Vol 53 (September 2014) |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a The 20 Century saw two distinguished psychologists born in the same year in tekl of development Psychology, One is Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, the other is Vygotsky,a Soviet psychologist, An interminable argument once arose between them about the approach and internal mechanism of children s development. Consequently, two different paradigms emerged in the study of developmental psychology. Piaget pioneered the paradigm of natural science while Vygotsky did that of social culture. While Piaget and Vygotsky made remarkable achievements in the goals of their own desires, the two paradigms couldn’t be integrated together, because the scientific views that Piaget and Vygotsky held are mutually exclusive |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a 在20世纪的发展心理学领域,有两位同年出生的伟大心理学家,他们是瑞士的皮亚杰和苏俄的维果茨基.他们之间曾有过一场关于儿童发展途径和内部机制的未终结的争论,并由此演变成发展心理学研究的两种不同的范式,即以皮亚杰为代表的自然科学范式和以维果茨基为代表的社会文化范式.两种范式在目标和结果方面都是富有成果的,两种范式都有存在的理由,但彼此没有交叉也不可能加以整合,因为作为它们基础的科学观是相互排斥的 |
|---|
| 650 | [1 7] |a Khoa học xã hội & nhân văn |2 TVĐHHN. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a comparative study. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a developmental psychology. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a paradigm. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Piaget. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Vygotsky. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a 比较. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a 皮亚杰. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a 范式. |
|---|
| 653 | [ 0] |a 发展心理学. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 维果茨基. |
|---|
| 773 | [ 0] |t Journal of Huazhong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences) |g 2014, Vol 53, N.5 |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|