TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
Focuson Form和Focuson Forms两种教学法对汉语二语词汇学习的影响 =The Role of Form-focused Instruction in CSL Vocabulary LearningA Comparative Study of “Focus on Form” versus “Focus on Forms”

Focuson Form和Focuson Forms两种教学法对汉语二语词汇学习的影响 =The Role of Form-focused Instruction in CSL Vocabulary LearningA Comparative Study of “Focus on Form” versus “Focus on Forms”

 洪, 炜
 264-275p 中文
Ngôn ngữfocus on formfocus on formsL2 vocabulary learningvocabulary knowledge意义优先聚焦形式教学法全形式教学法二语词汇学习词汇知识
Tác giả CN 洪, 炜
Nhan đề Focuson Form和Focuson Forms两种教学法对汉语二语词汇学习的影响 =The Role of Form-focused Instruction in CSL Vocabulary Learning:A Comparative Study of “Focus on Form” versus “Focus on Forms” / 洪炜, Hong Wei.
Mô tả vật lý 264-275p
Tóm tắt 本文通过一项教学实验考察两种不同的形式教学法,即:意义优先、聚焦形式教学法(Focus on Form,简称FonF)和全形式教学法(Focus on Forms,简称FonFs)对汉语二语词汇学习的影响。意义优先、聚焦形式教学法在完成阅读理解任务的过程中学习生词,而全形式教学法则采用传统的词汇表方式学习生词。实验从五个维度测量了两种教学法对汉语二语词汇学习的影响,结果发现:整体而言,全形式教学法对汉语二语学习者的词汇学习效果更显著;尤其是在词汇搭配、词义联想方面,全形式教学法显著优于意义优先、聚焦形式教学法。
Tóm tắt This paper presents an empirical study on the effects of two types of formfocused instruction—focus on form(FonF)and focus on forms(FonFs)— on CSL vocabulary learning.The FonF approach attends to target words within a reading comprehension task,while FonFs teaches and practices target words by means of a word list and two vocabulary exercises.Five aspects of vocabulary knowledge were measured in order to compare the effectiveness of both types of instruction.The results indicate that in general,the FonFs approach is more effective than FonF for L2 learning of Chinese vocabulary.To be more specific,FonFs gives learners advantages in vocabulary collocation and association.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Ngôn ngữ- Giảng dạy-TV ĐHHN
Từ khóa tự do focus on form
Từ khóa tự do focus on forms
Từ khóa tự do L2 vocabulary learning
Từ khóa tự do vocabulary knowledge
Từ khóa tự do 意义优先
Từ khóa tự do 聚焦形式教学法全形式教学法二语词汇学习词汇知识
Tác giả(bs) CN 王丽婧, Wang Lijing
Nguồn trích 世界汉语教学i, vol 30, no 2, 2016-
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00141411
0022
00452002
005201812250925
008160928s | a 000 0 chi d
0091 0
035[ ] |a 1456373619
039[ ] |a 20241202164704 |b idtocn |c 20181225092517 |d huett |y 20160928080003 |z svtt
041[ 0] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[ 0] |a 洪, 炜
245[ 0] |a Focuson Form和Focuson Forms两种教学法对汉语二语词汇学习的影响 =The Role of Form-focused Instruction in CSL Vocabulary Learning:A Comparative Study of “Focus on Form” versus “Focus on Forms” / |c 洪炜, Hong Wei.
300[ ] |a 264-275p
362[ 0] |a Volume 30 (April 2016)
520[ ] |a 本文通过一项教学实验考察两种不同的形式教学法,即:意义优先、聚焦形式教学法(Focus on Form,简称FonF)和全形式教学法(Focus on Forms,简称FonFs)对汉语二语词汇学习的影响。意义优先、聚焦形式教学法在完成阅读理解任务的过程中学习生词,而全形式教学法则采用传统的词汇表方式学习生词。实验从五个维度测量了两种教学法对汉语二语词汇学习的影响,结果发现:整体而言,全形式教学法对汉语二语学习者的词汇学习效果更显著;尤其是在词汇搭配、词义联想方面,全形式教学法显著优于意义优先、聚焦形式教学法。
520[ ] |a This paper presents an empirical study on the effects of two types of formfocused instruction—focus on form(FonF)and focus on forms(FonFs)— on CSL vocabulary learning.The FonF approach attends to target words within a reading comprehension task,while FonFs teaches and practices target words by means of a word list and two vocabulary exercises.Five aspects of vocabulary knowledge were measured in order to compare the effectiveness of both types of instruction.The results indicate that in general,the FonFs approach is more effective than FonF for L2 learning of Chinese vocabulary.To be more specific,FonFs gives learners advantages in vocabulary collocation and association.
650[1 7] |a Ngôn ngữ |x Giảng dạy |2 TV ĐHHN
653[0 ] |a focus on form
653[0 ] |a focus on forms
653[0 ] |a L2 vocabulary learning
653[0 ] |a vocabulary knowledge
653[0 ] |a 意义优先
653[0 ] |a 聚焦形式教学法全形式教学法二语词汇学习词汇知识
700[ ] |a 王丽婧, Wang Lijing
773[ 0] |t 世界汉语教学i, vol 30, no 2, 2016
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0