| 000 | 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 41412 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 52003 |
|---|
| 005 | 201812250926 |
|---|
| 008 | 160928s | a 000 0 chi d |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456379246 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456379246 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241129093935 |b idtocn |c 20241129093531 |d idtocn |y 20160928080544 |z svtt |
|---|
| 041 | [ 0] |a chi |
|---|
| 044 | [ ] |a ch |
|---|
| 100 | [ 0] |a 赵, 玮 |
|---|
| 245 | [ 0] |a 汉语作为第二语言词汇教学“语素法”适用性研究 =A Study on the Applicability of the Morphemic Vocabulary Teaching Method to Learners of Chinese as a Second Language / |c 赵 玮, Zhao Wei. |
|---|
| 300 | [ ] |a 276-288p |
|---|
| 362 | [ 0] |a Volume 30 (April 2016) |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a 本文通过一项教学实验,考察了汉语作为第二语言词汇教学中"语素法"对语素义和词义关系不同的词语、语素项常用度不同的词语及词义具体性不同的词语的适用性。实验组和对照组分别采用语素法和语境法。实验结果表明,补充型、引申型词语,语素项常用度较高的词语及具体性较低的词语的教学中,语境法更具优势,利用语素法教授上述类别词语时,应尽量结合语境。 |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a This paper presents an empirical study on the applicability of the morphemic method for teaching different kinds of words to learners of Chinese as a second language.The target words are different in the relationship between morphemic meaning and word meaning,the frequency of morpheme occurrence and the concreteness of word meaning.The experiment group was taught in the morphemic method and the control group in the contextual method.The results showed that control group performed significantly better than the experiment group in four cases:words having a supplementary meaning,words with an extended meaning,words with high frequency morphemes,and words of low concreteness.Therefore,teachers should provide contextual information when teaching these kinds of words in the morphemic method. |
|---|
| 650 | [1 7] |a Ngôn ngữ |x Giảng dạy |2 TV ĐHHN |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a focus on form |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a focus on forms |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a L2 vocabulary learning |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a vocabulary knowledge |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 意义优先 |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 聚焦形式教学法全形式教学法二语词汇学习词汇知识 |
|---|
| 773 | [ 0] |t 世界汉语教学i, vol 30, no 2, 2016 |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|