TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
高校查处学术不端行为的双重困境与制度选择 =

高校查处学术不端行为的双重困境与制度选择 = : On Investigation of Academic Misconducts at a University Its Dual Predicaments and Right System to Choose

 Xie, Xiao-yao.
 中国社会科学院近代史研究所
 70-83+159 p. 中文 ISSN: 10077278
叠权式权力结构学术不端学术共同体正当程序高校
Tác giả CN Xie, Xiao-yao.
Nhan đề 高校查处学术不端行为的双重困境与制度选择 = On Investigation of Academic Misconducts at a University: Its Dual Predicaments and Right System to Choose /谢小瑶； 叶继元, XIE Xiao-yao;YE Ji-yuan;
Thông tin xuất bản 中国社会科学院近代史研究所
Mô tả vật lý 70-83+159 p.
Tóm tắt Due to the disagreement in people’s knowledge of what is an academic misconduct,there is quite a confusion in defining academic misconduct, academic ethic anomie and academic corruption. In investigating and punishing these misconducts,a university may find itself in both the external and internal predicaments,for lack of a right system and a commonly accepted criterion for making a conviction of guilt in dealing with academic scandals. While there is an authoritative structure overlapped with authorities for investigation,conviction and administration in the procedure,there are existing contradicting criteria for conviction making. The predicaments,on the one hand,are not conducive to an effective control of the power exercised in investigating academic misconducts; On the other hand,they may not help to protect the legitimate interests of the party involved.To find a way out,we must set up what can replace the "overlapping power structure"with normative requirements of a due system,which will keep away potential arbitrariness in investigation. The criteria accepted and enacted by academic community will help academic community to have a keen awareness of academic misbehaviours.
Tóm tắt 因为对学术不端行为存在认知上的偏差,人们常将学术失范、科研伦理失范、学术腐败等概念混为一谈。高校在查处学术不端行为过程中,由于缺乏正当程序以及统一的学术不端行为判定标准,往往陷入外在和内在的双重困境:前者呈现出学术不端行为查处的调查权、判断权及行政权之间的"叠权式权力结构";后者则体现为判定标准上的多重模式。这既不利于有效规范学术不端行为查处权力,亦无法维护当事人合法权益。欲化解这些难题,应以正当程序的规范性要求改造"叠权式权力结构",防控查处中可能滋生的恣意;通过学术共同体制定判定标准,导引人们对学术不端行为的认知。
Từ khóa tự do 叠权式权力结构
Từ khóa tự do 学术不端
Từ khóa tự do 学术共同体
Từ khóa tự do 正当程序
Từ khóa tự do 高校
Tác giả(bs) CN Ye, Ji-yuan;
Nguồn trích Journal of Nanjing University .- 2016, No.4.
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00143751
0022
00454358
008161026s ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10077278
035[ ] |a 1456388668
039[ ] |a 20241130092908 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20161026102137 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a Xie, Xiao-yao.
245[1 0] |a 高校查处学术不端行为的双重困境与制度选择 = |b On Investigation of Academic Misconducts at a University: Its Dual Predicaments and Right System to Choose / |c 谢小瑶； 叶继元, XIE Xiao-yao;YE Ji-yuan;
260[ ] |b 中国社会科学院近代史研究所
300[ ] |a 70-83+159 p.
362[0 ] |a No 4 (2016)
520[ ] |a Due to the disagreement in people’s knowledge of what is an academic misconduct,there is quite a confusion in defining academic misconduct, academic ethic anomie and academic corruption. In investigating and punishing these misconducts,a university may find itself in both the external and internal predicaments,for lack of a right system and a commonly accepted criterion for making a conviction of guilt in dealing with academic scandals. While there is an authoritative structure overlapped with authorities for investigation,conviction and administration in the procedure,there are existing contradicting criteria for conviction making. The predicaments,on the one hand,are not conducive to an effective control of the power exercised in investigating academic misconducts; On the other hand,they may not help to protect the legitimate interests of the party involved.To find a way out,we must set up what can replace the "overlapping power structure"with normative requirements of a due system,which will keep away potential arbitrariness in investigation. The criteria accepted and enacted by academic community will help academic community to have a keen awareness of academic misbehaviours.
520[ ] |a 因为对学术不端行为存在认知上的偏差,人们常将学术失范、科研伦理失范、学术腐败等概念混为一谈。高校在查处学术不端行为过程中,由于缺乏正当程序以及统一的学术不端行为判定标准,往往陷入外在和内在的双重困境:前者呈现出学术不端行为查处的调查权、判断权及行政权之间的"叠权式权力结构";后者则体现为判定标准上的多重模式。这既不利于有效规范学术不端行为查处权力,亦无法维护当事人合法权益。欲化解这些难题,应以正当程序的规范性要求改造"叠权式权力结构",防控查处中可能滋生的恣意;通过学术共同体制定判定标准,导引人们对学术不端行为的认知。
653[0 ] |a 叠权式权力结构
653[0 ] |a 学术不端
653[0 ] |a 学术共同体
653[0 ] |a 正当程序
653[0 ] |a 高校
700[0 ] |a Ye, Ji-yuan;
773[ ] |t Journal of Nanjing University . |g 2016, No.4.
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0