TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
Are international accounting standards more credit relevant than domestic standards?

Are international accounting standards more credit relevant than domestic standards?

 Florou, Annita.
 2017.
 p. 1-29. English
credit ratingscredit relevancedebt marketsIFRS
Tác giả CN Florou, Annita.
Nhan đề Are international accounting standards more credit relevant than domestic standards?/ Annita Florou, Urska Kosi, Peter F.Pope
Thông tin xuất bản 2017.
Mô tả vật lý p. 1-29.
Tóm tắt We examine whether the credit relevance of financial statements, defined as the ability of accounting numbers to explain credit ratings, is higher after firms are required to report under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). We find an improvement in credit relevance for firms in 17 countries after mandatory IFRS reporting is introduced in 2005; this increase is higher than that reported for a matched sample of US firms. The increase in credit relevance is particularly pronounced for higher risk speculative-grade issuers, where accounting information is predicted to be more important; and for IFRS adopters with large first-time reconciliations, where the impact of IFRS is expected to be greater. These tests provide reassurance that the overall enhancement in estimated credit relevance is driven by accounting changes related to IFRS adoption. Our results suggest that credit rating analysts’ views of economic fundamentals are more closely aligned with IFRS numbers, and that analysts anticipate at least some of the effects of the IFRS transition.
Từ khóa tự do credit ratings
Từ khóa tự do credit relevance
Từ khóa tự do debt markets
Từ khóa tự do IFRS
Tác giả(bs) CN Florou, Annita.
Tác giả(bs) CN Kosi, Urska.
Tác giả(bs) CN Pope, Peter F.
Nguồn trích Accounting and Business Research- vol.3-2017
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00150674
0022
00461456
005202007101520
008171006s2017 enk a 000 0 eng d
0091 0
035[ ] |a 1456365696
039[ ] |a 20241125210528 |b idtocn |c 20200710152057 |d huongnt |y 20171006105447 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a eng
044[ ] |a enk
100[1 ] |a Florou, Annita.
245[1 0] |a Are international accounting standards more credit relevant than domestic standards?/ |c Annita Florou, Urska Kosi, Peter F.Pope
260[ ] |c 2017.
300[ ] |a p. 1-29.
520[ ] |a We examine whether the credit relevance of financial statements, defined as the ability of accounting numbers to explain credit ratings, is higher after firms are required to report under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). We find an improvement in credit relevance for firms in 17 countries after mandatory IFRS reporting is introduced in 2005; this increase is higher than that reported for a matched sample of US firms. The increase in credit relevance is particularly pronounced for higher risk speculative-grade issuers, where accounting information is predicted to be more important; and for IFRS adopters with large first-time reconciliations, where the impact of IFRS is expected to be greater. These tests provide reassurance that the overall enhancement in estimated credit relevance is driven by accounting changes related to IFRS adoption. Our results suggest that credit rating analysts’ views of economic fundamentals are more closely aligned with IFRS numbers, and that analysts anticipate at least some of the effects of the IFRS transition.
653[0 ] |a credit ratings
653[0 ] |a credit relevance
653[0 ] |a debt markets
653[0 ] |a IFRS
700[ 1] |a Florou, Annita.
700[1 ] |a Kosi, Urska.
700[1 ] |a Pope, Peter F.
773[ ] |t Accounting and Business Research |g vol.3-2017
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0