| 000 | 00000cab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 50841 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 61626 |
|---|
| 005 | 202007031604 |
|---|
| 008 | 171125s2017 fr| a 000 0 fre d |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456408197 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241129164121 |b idtocn |c 20200703160403 |d tult |y 20171125104853 |z huongnt |
|---|
| 041 | [0 ] |a fre |
|---|
| 044 | [ ] |a fr |
|---|
| 100 | [1 ] |a Bonnot, Christine. |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a Variation catégorielle et polysémie : Comparaison des conjonctions de coordination / marqueurs discursifs I (russe) et KE (grec moderne) / |c Christine Bonnot,Sophie Vassilaki. |
|---|
| 260 | [ ] |c 2017 |
|---|
| 300 | [ ] |a pp. 65-78. |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a The goal of this study is to investigate similarities and dissimilarities between the Russian I and Modern Greek KE. The items under discussion perform similar roles in both languages. In fact, they bear a double status, as coordinating conjunctions and as discourse markers. In the first part of this analysis, it is argued that this twofold function emerges as a continuum ranging from syntax to discourse. In the second part, the semantic invariants of I and KE are explored by putting forward their single differentiating parameter, which gives rise to a variety of semantic values organizing the relevant domain. |
|---|
| 650 | [1 0] |a Coordinating conjunction |x Discourse marker |x Polycategorial unit |x Russian |x Modern Greek. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Discourse marker. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Coordinating conjunction. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Modern Greek. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Polycategorial unit. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Russian. |
|---|
| 700 | [1 ] |a Vassilaki, Sophie. |
|---|
| 773 | [ ] |t Langages |g n° 207 (3/2017) |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|