| 000 | 00000nab#a2200000ui#4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 51044 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | D759D5FA-4E08-45BF-B90D-BB997193352F |
|---|
| 005 | 201803011450 |
|---|
| 008 | 081223s vm| vie |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456374814 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241129131853 |b idtocn |c 20180301145009 |d huett |y 20180301144926 |z huett |
|---|
| 041 | [0 ] |a chi |
|---|
| 044 | [ ] |a ch |
|---|
| 100 | [1 ] |a 朴珍玉 |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a 非作格双宾句数量宾语的信息结构特征分析 / |c 朴珍玉 |
|---|
| 300 | [1 0] |a tr.33-42 |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a 根据"非宾格假说",非作格动词不能带宾语。带双宾语更是违反动词论元结构的非常规现象。以往研究无论是从论元结构的角度,还是从事件结构的角度,都无法对非作格动词带双宾语现象给出合理的解释。本文结合信息结构理论,从直接宾语必须是数量宾语这一特点入手,指出双宾结构的特殊性,重新分析数量宾语在形式和意义上的必要性。 |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a According to the "unaccusative hypothesis", unergative verbs can not take an object.Taking double objects is an unconventional phenomenon in violation of the argument structure of verbs. In the past, neither from the point of view of the argument structure or from the point of view of the event structure, it is impossible to give a reasonable explanation of the unergative verbs with double object. Based on the theory of information structure, starting with the characteristics that the direct object must use numeral-classifier constituents, this paper points out the particularity of the double object structure and reanalyze the necessity of the numeral-classifier constituents in form and meaning. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a 非作格动词 |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a 双宾语 |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a information structure |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a 双事件 |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a double event |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a 数量成分 |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a double-object construction |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a numeral-classifier constituent |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a unergative verbs |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 信息结构 |
|---|
| 773 | [ ] |t 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning |g 2017(04) |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|