TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
Re-theorizing the configuration of organizational fields the IIRC and the pursuit of ‘Enlightened’ corporate reporting

Re-theorizing the configuration of organizational fields the IIRC and the pursuit of ‘Enlightened’ corporate reporting

 2017.
 p. 30-63. English
Accountancy profession,Boundary work,Corporate reporting,IIRC,Institutional work,Integrated reporting,Non-financial reporting,Organizational field,+ 2 từ khóa
Nhan đề Re-theorizing the configuration of organizational fields: the IIRC and the pursuit of ‘Enlightened’ corporate reporting / Christopher Humphrey, Brendan O’Dwyer, Jeffrey Unerman
Thông tin xuất bản 2017.
Mô tả vật lý p. 30-63.
Tóm tắt This paper studies the emergence of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and its attempts to institutionalize integrated reporting as a practice that is critical to the relevance and value of corporate reporting. Informed by Suddaby and Viale’s [(2011). Professionals and field-level change: institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59, 423–442] theorization of how professionals reconfigure organizational fields, the paper delineates the strategies and mechanisms through which the IIRC has sought to enroll the support of a wide range of stakeholder groups for the idea of integrated reporting in order to deliver a fundamental reconfiguration of the corporate reporting field. The paper’s analysis reinforces the significance to any such field reconfiguration of the reciprocal and mutual arrangements between influential professionals and other powerful actors but does so in a way that (a) refines Suddaby and Viale’s theorization of processes of field-level change and (b) pinpoints the fundamental policy challenges facing the IIRC. Gieryn’s [(1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48 (6), 781–795] notion of boundary work is operationalized to capture some of the complexity and dynamism of the change process that is not sufficiently represented by Suddaby and Viale’s more sequentialist theorization. From a policy perspective, the paper demonstrates just how much the IIRC’s prospects for success in reconfiguring the corporate reporting field depend on its ability to reconfigure the mainstream investment field. Ultimately, this serves to question whether the IIRC’s conceptualization of ‘enlightened’ corporate reporting is sufficiently powerful and persuasive to stimulate ‘enlightened’ investment behavior focused on the medium and long term – and, more generally stresses the theoretical significance of considering connections across related organizational fields in institutional analyses of field reconfiguration efforts.
Từ khóa tự do Accountancy profession,
Từ khóa tự do Boundary work,
Từ khóa tự do Corporate reporting,
Từ khóa tự do Corporate reporting,
Từ khóa tự do IIRC,
Từ khóa tự do Institutional work,
Từ khóa tự do Integrated reporting,
Từ khóa tự do Non-financial reporting,
Từ khóa tự do Organizational field,
Từ khóa tự do Enlightened investment behavior
Từ khóa tự do Sustainability reporting,
Nguồn trích Accounting and Business Research - Volume 47, 2017 - Issue 1
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab#a2200000ui#4500
00151067
0022
004440C5C31-B318-4179-8BE8-F289072F01B4
005202007101645
008081223s2017 vm| vie
0091 0
035[ ] |a 1456370228
039[ ] |a 20241208230203 |b idtocn |c 20200710164542 |d huongnt |y 20180302091940 |z huett
041[0 ] |a eng
245[1 0] |a Re-theorizing the configuration of organizational fields: the IIRC and the pursuit of ‘Enlightened’ corporate reporting / |c Christopher Humphrey, Brendan O’Dwyer, Jeffrey Unerman
260[ ] |c 2017.
300[1 0] |a p. 30-63.
520[ ] |a This paper studies the emergence of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and its attempts to institutionalize integrated reporting as a practice that is critical to the relevance and value of corporate reporting. Informed by Suddaby and Viale’s [(2011). Professionals and field-level change: institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59, 423–442] theorization of how professionals reconfigure organizational fields, the paper delineates the strategies and mechanisms through which the IIRC has sought to enroll the support of a wide range of stakeholder groups for the idea of integrated reporting in order to deliver a fundamental reconfiguration of the corporate reporting field. The paper’s analysis reinforces the significance to any such field reconfiguration of the reciprocal and mutual arrangements between influential professionals and other powerful actors but does so in a way that (a) refines Suddaby and Viale’s theorization of processes of field-level change and (b) pinpoints the fundamental policy challenges facing the IIRC. Gieryn’s [(1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48 (6), 781–795] notion of boundary work is operationalized to capture some of the complexity and dynamism of the change process that is not sufficiently represented by Suddaby and Viale’s more sequentialist theorization. From a policy perspective, the paper demonstrates just how much the IIRC’s prospects for success in reconfiguring the corporate reporting field depend on its ability to reconfigure the mainstream investment field. Ultimately, this serves to question whether the IIRC’s conceptualization of ‘enlightened’ corporate reporting is sufficiently powerful and persuasive to stimulate ‘enlightened’ investment behavior focused on the medium and long term – and, more generally stresses the theoretical significance of considering connections across related organizational fields in institutional analyses of field reconfiguration efforts.
653[ ] |a Accountancy profession,
653[ ] |a Boundary work,
653[ ] |a Corporate reporting,
653[ ] |a Corporate reporting,
653[ ] |a IIRC,
653[ ] |a Institutional work,
653[ ] |a Integrated reporting,
653[ ] |a Non-financial reporting,
653[ ] |a Organizational field,
653[ ] |a Enlightened investment behavior
653[0 ] |a Sustainability reporting,
773[ ] |t Accounting and Business Research |g Volume 47, 2017 - Issue 1
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0