| 000 | 00000nab#a2200000ui#4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 51093 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | D272571D-FA9C-41D6-A450-5A4435D8779E |
|---|
| 005 | 202007130839 |
|---|
| 008 | 081223s2017 vm| vie |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456367812 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241128113552 |b idtocn |c 20200713083913 |d huongnt |y 20180302144039 |z huett |
|---|
| 041 | [0 ] |a eng |
|---|
| 100 | [1 ] |a Hellmann, Andreas. |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a The influence of textual presentation order and graphical presentation on the judgements of non-professional investors / |c Andreas Hellmann, Chiing Yeow, Lurion De Mello |
|---|
| 260 | [ ] |c 2017. |
|---|
| 300 | [1 0] |a p. 455-470. |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a The aim of this study is to examine the influence of textual presentation order and graphical presentation on the judgements of non-professional investors. Adopting an experimental approach and drawing on the belief-adjustment model, the study captures whether a recency effect prevails and whether this effect can be moderated by the inclusion of a graph. Additionally, the study utilises eye-tracking to provide a novel insight into the processes individuals use to assess financial information and form judgements. The results reveal that non-professional investors are susceptible to recency effects due to the strategic presentation ordering of narrative information. Non-professional investors give a lower performance rating if the negative information is presented last. The recency effect is not reduced through the inclusion of a graph. |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Decision-useful information |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Graphical presentation |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Investor judgements |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Order effect |
|---|
| 653 | [ ] |a Recency effect |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Impression management |
|---|
| 700 | [0 ] |a De Mello, Lurion. |
|---|
| 700 | [0 ] |a Yeow, Chiing. |
|---|
| 773 | [0 ] |t Accounting and Business Research |g Volume 47, 2017 - Issue 4 |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|