| 000 | 00000nab#a2200000ui#4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 52250 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | B2872C86-7E12-4F76-84BA-DA70F1D18687 |
|---|
| 005 | 202007171620 |
|---|
| 008 | 081223s2018 vm| vie |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456370294 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241208230053 |b idtocn |c 20200717162004 |d huongnt |y 20180531152858 |z huett |
|---|
| 041 | [0 ] |a eng |
|---|
| 100 | [1 ] |a Evangelidis, Ioannis |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a The Asymmetric Impact of Context on Advantaged Versus Disadvantaged Options / |c Ioannis Evangelidis, Jonathan Levav, and Itamar Simonson |
|---|
| 260 | [ ] |c 2018. |
|---|
| 300 | [1 0] |a p. 239-253. |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a Despite substantial prior research regarding the effect of context on choices, uncertainty remains regarding when particular context effects will be observed. In this article, the authors advance a new perspective on context-dependent choices, according to which context effects are a function of the relative advantage of one option over another and of the different strategies that decision makers evoke when making a choice. They propose that context effects resulting from the addition of a third option to a two-option set are more frequently observed when the added option is relatively similar (adjacent) to the “disadvantaged” alternative (i.e., the lower-share option) in the set. The authors conduct a series of studies to analyze the occurrence of context effects and find support for predictions related to asymmetric dominance and extremeness aversion. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Similarity |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Asymmetric dominance |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Attraction effect |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Compromise effect |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Extremeness aversion |
|---|
| 700 | [ ] |a Levav, Jonathan |
|---|
| 700 | [ ] |a Simonson, Itamar |
|---|
| 773 | [0 ] |t Journal of Marketing Research: April 2018, |g Vol. 55, No. 2. |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|