| 000 | 00000nab#a2200000ui#4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 54101 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 7A875DCC-6AF3-4417-9984-CEA6FDDE9DB4 |
|---|
| 005 | 201901031406 |
|---|
| 008 | 081223s vm| vie |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456381777 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241129133753 |b idtocn |c 20190103140658 |d huongnt |y 20190103104158 |z huongnt |
|---|
| 041 | [0 ] |a chi |
|---|
| 044 | [ ] |a ch |
|---|
| 100 | [0 ] |a 罗思明. |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a 英汉时间词特质及其语言蕴含共性 / |c 罗思明; 王文斌; 王佳敏. |
|---|
| 300 | [ ] |a tr. 643-655+799 |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a Based on quite rich data, this paper begins with the exploration of the peculiarities and implicational universals of English and Chinese temporal terms from a typological perspective, and concludes with a cognitive interpretation. It comes to four findings: firstly, English is future-oriented while Chinese is past-oriented in terms of time-domain reference; secondly, English is semantically accuracy-oriented while Chinese is semantically vagueness-oriented; thirdly, as regards English and Chine... More |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a 本文从类型学角度,基于较为丰富的语料探究英汉时间词的典型特质及其语言蕴含共性,并试图做出认知阐释。研究发现主要有四:1)英语时间词具有未来取向,汉语时间词具有过去取向,英汉语分属未来取向语言和过去取向语言;2)英语时间词具有精确表义取向,汉语时间词具有模糊表义取向,英汉语分属精确表义语言和模糊表义语言;3)英汉时间词遵循两条蕴含共性:未来取向∩精确表义;过去取向∩模糊表义;4)英汉时间词的典型特质及其语言蕴含共性取决于其对"时间在动"和"自我在动"认知模型的不同选择。 |
|---|
| 650 | [ ] |a 外语教学与研究. |2 $t外语教学与研究 ,Foreign Language Teaching and Research , Editorial E-mail ,$gNo 5. 2018 |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 认知模型. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 时间词特质. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 蕴含共性. |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 语言类型; |
|---|
| 700 | [0 ] |a 王文斌. |
|---|
| 700 | [0 ] |a 王佳敏. |
|---|
| 773 | [ ] |t Foreign Language Teaching and Research. |g 5/2018 |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|