| 000 | 00000nfb#a2200000ui#4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 57125 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | A5C035A3-CE60-4FAD-B5CC-BFB95AB987D5 |
|---|
| 005 | 202007031355 |
|---|
| 008 | 081223s vm| vie |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 035 | [ ] |a 1456408731 |
|---|
| 039 | [ ] |a 20241201181557 |b idtocn |c 20200703135508 |d thuvt |y 20191129144424 |z thuvt |
|---|
| 041 | [0 ] |a chi |
|---|
| 044 | [ ] |a ch |
|---|
| 100 | [0 ] |a 高航 |
|---|
| 245 | [1 0] |a 认知语法框架下动作的指称策略考察 / |c 高航 |
|---|
| 300 | [1 0] |a tr.62-70 |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a 语法学界关于汉语单音节动词的普遍观点是,它们是动词范畴的典型成员,不能名物化。由此产生的问题是,汉语如何实现动作的指称,因为典型的动作动词都是单音节。本文在认知语法框架内基于真实语料考察发现,动作动词可以发生名物化,其语义功能在于对动作进行指称。另一种指称策略是使用动量词,包括专用动量词中的"下"和借用动量词中的器官量词、工具量词。由于动量词的广泛使用,名物化的指称策略处于相对次要的地位 |
|---|
| 520 | [ ] |a A popular view among grammarians is that monosyllabic verbs in Chinese, as prototypical members of the category of verbs, cannot be nominalized. However, this leads to the following question. Action verbs in Chinese are prototypically monosyllabic verbs. If they cannot be nominalized, how can reference to action be achieved in Chinese? This papers investigates this question, based on real language use, within the framework of Cognitive Grammar. And our study shows that action verbs can be nominalized, contrary to the popular view, in order to achieve reference to action. Another referential strategy use of verb classifiers, including specialized classifers like "xia" and borrowed classifiers, like body part classifiers and instrument classifiers. Owing to the high frequency of verb classifiers used in reference, nominalization of monosyllabic action verbs plays a less important role, and has thus been ignored in previous studies. |
|---|
| 650 | [1 0] |a 指称 |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 认知语法 |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 名物化 |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 动量词 |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a 动作动词 |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Ngữ pháp |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Tài liệu tham khảo |
|---|
| 653 | [0 ] |a Chia động từ |
|---|
| 773 | [ ] |t 汉语学习 |g No.4/2019 |
|---|
| 890 | [ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0 |
|---|