TRA CỨU
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
Lessons from the English auxiliary system

Lessons from the English auxiliary system

 Cambridge University Press, 2020
 United Kingdom : p.87-155 English ISSN: 00222267
Nhan đề Lessons from the English auxiliary system / Ivan a. Sag,...
Thông tin xuất bản United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2020
Mô tả vật lý p.87-155
Tóm tắt The English auxiliary system exhibits many lexical exceptions and subregularities, and considerable dialectal variation, all of which are frequently omitted from generative analyses and discussions. This paper presents a detailed, movement-free account of the English Auxiliary System within Sign-Based Construction Grammar (Sag 2010, Michaelis 2011, Boas & Sag 2012) that utilizes techniques of lexicalist and construction-based analysis. The resulting conception of linguistic knowledge involves constraints that license hierarchical structures directly (as in context-free grammar), rather than by appeal to mappings over such structures. This allows English auxiliaries to be modeled as a class of verbs whose behavior is governed by general and class-specific constraints. Central to this account is a novel use of the feature aux, which is set both constructionally and lexically, allowing for a complex interplay between various grammatical constraints that captures a wide range of exceptional patterns, most notably the vexing distribution of unstressed do, and the fact that Ellipsis can interact with other aspects of the analysis to produce the feeding and blocking relations that are needed to generate the complex facts of EAS. The present approach, superior both descriptively and theoretically to existing transformational approaches, also serves to undermine views of the biology of language and acquisition such as Berwick et al. (2011), which are centered on mappings that manipulate hierarchical phrase structures in a structure-dependent fashion.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề English-Auxiliary system
Từ khóa tự do Ngữ pháp
Từ khóa tự do Tiếng Anh
Từ khóa tự do Auxiliary system
Tác giả(bs) CN Chaves, Rui P
Tác giả(bs) CN Abeillé, Anne
Tác giả(bs) CN Estigarribia, Bruno
Tác giả(bs) CN Sag, Ivan A.
Nguồn trích Journal of Linguistics- Volume 65, Issue 1, February 2020
Tệp tin điện tử https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-linguistics/article/lessons-from-the-english-auxiliary-system/6679B1EE13828805781AB9BE52F49741
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab#a2200000ui#4500
00159944
0022
004DD025292-3279-4CFC-A865-9E1F863BD7F9
005202105051633
008081223s2020 vm| vie
0091 0
022[ ] |a 00222267
035[ ] |a 1456368673
039[ ] |a 20241209092056 |b idtocn |c 20210505163323 |d tult |y 20201204112728 |z huongnt
041[0 ] |a eng
044[ ] |a enk
245[0 0] |a Lessons from the English auxiliary system / |c Ivan a. Sag,...
260[ ] |a United Kingdom : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2020
300[ ] |a p.87-155
520[ ] |a The English auxiliary system exhibits many lexical exceptions and subregularities, and considerable dialectal variation, all of which are frequently omitted from generative analyses and discussions. This paper presents a detailed, movement-free account of the English Auxiliary System within Sign-Based Construction Grammar (Sag 2010, Michaelis 2011, Boas & Sag 2012) that utilizes techniques of lexicalist and construction-based analysis. The resulting conception of linguistic knowledge involves constraints that license hierarchical structures directly (as in context-free grammar), rather than by appeal to mappings over such structures. This allows English auxiliaries to be modeled as a class of verbs whose behavior is governed by general and class-specific constraints. Central to this account is a novel use of the feature aux, which is set both constructionally and lexically, allowing for a complex interplay between various grammatical constraints that captures a wide range of exceptional patterns, most notably the vexing distribution of unstressed do, and the fact that Ellipsis can interact with other aspects of the analysis to produce the feeding and blocking relations that are needed to generate the complex facts of EAS. The present approach, superior both descriptively and theoretically to existing transformational approaches, also serves to undermine views of the biology of language and acquisition such as Berwick et al. (2011), which are centered on mappings that manipulate hierarchical phrase structures in a structure-dependent fashion.
650[1 0] |a English |x Auxiliary system
653[0 ] |a Ngữ pháp
653[0 ] |a Tiếng Anh
653[0 ] |a Auxiliary system
700[1 ] |a Chaves, Rui P
700[1 ] |a Abeillé, Anne
700[1 ] |a Estigarribia, Bruno
700[1 ] |a Sag, Ivan A.
773[ ] |t Journal of Linguistics |g Volume 65, Issue 1, February 2020
856[ ] |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-linguistics/article/lessons-from-the-english-auxiliary-system/6679B1EE13828805781AB9BE52F49741
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0