TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
存在歧义格式吗

存在歧义格式吗

 王红旗
 吉林省延吉市, 2020
 中国 : p.3-12 中文 ISSN: 10037365
Chinese中国人Tiếng Trung QuốcNgữ phápCấu trúc ngữ pháp
Tác giả CN 王红旗
Nhan đề 存在歧义格式吗 / 王红旗
Thông tin xuất bản 中国 : 吉林省延吉市, 2020
Mô tả vật lý p.3-12
Tóm tắt Zhu Dexi(1980) proposes that the existence of grammatical ambiguous sentences is due to the ambiguity of grammatical patterns. According to this view, almost all the grammatical patterns are potentially ambiguous, which leads to an "ambiguous pattern paradox", that is, all grammatical patterns are ambiguous patterns. This paper makes an analysis of the "ambiguous patterns", and points out that some ambiguous patterns are actually not even the same overt grammatical structural patterns, while other patterns do have the same overt grammatical structure but with different covert grammatical meanings. In the strict sense, ambiguous patterns should be grammatical structural patterns of both the same overt and the same covert grammatical meanings. So ambiguous patterns do not exist on this definition.
Tóm tắt 朱德熙(1980)认为与语法有关的歧义句是由句子的语法结构格式造成的,是句子的语法结构格式有歧义。按这种观点推论,几乎所有的语法结构格式都可能有歧义,那就会导致语法结构格式都是歧义格式的结论,这就相当于取消了歧义格式,出现"歧义格式"悖论。文章对学界所谓的歧义格式分析后认为,学界所谓的歧义格式在做两种语义解释时,有的并不属于同一种显性语法结构格式,有的只是显性语法意义相同而隐性语法意义不同的语法结构格式。严格意义的歧义格式应该是显性语法意义和隐性语法意义都相同的语法结构格式,这样的歧义格式并不存在。只是词类序列相同而显性语法意义不同的两个语法结构或显性语法意义相同而隐性语法意义不同的两个语法结构格式概括不成一个有歧义的(语法结构)格式。
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Chinese-Grammar structure
Thuật ngữ chủ đề 中国人-语法结构
Từ khóa tự do Tiếng Trung Quốc
Từ khóa tự do Ngữ pháp
Từ khóa tự do Cấu trúc ngữ pháp
Nguồn trích 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning- 2020(03)
Tệp tin điện tử eng.oversea.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbCode=cjfq&QueryID=34&CurRec=1&filename=HYXX202003001&dbname=CJFDLAST2020
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab#a2200000ui#4500
00161912
0022
0049E553A16-D6BF-438B-B396-2ECDAC202949
005202105110941
008081223s2020 vm| vie
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10037365
035[ ] |a 1456388671
039[ ] |a 20241201182907 |b idtocn |c 20210511094128 |d tult |y 20210429085222 |z huongnt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a 王红旗
245[1 0] |a 存在歧义格式吗 / |c 王红旗
260[ ] |a 中国 : |b 吉林省延吉市, |c 2020
300[ ] |a p.3-12
520[ ] |a Zhu Dexi(1980) proposes that the existence of grammatical ambiguous sentences is due to the ambiguity of grammatical patterns. According to this view, almost all the grammatical patterns are potentially ambiguous, which leads to an "ambiguous pattern paradox", that is, all grammatical patterns are ambiguous patterns. This paper makes an analysis of the "ambiguous patterns", and points out that some ambiguous patterns are actually not even the same overt grammatical structural patterns, while other patterns do have the same overt grammatical structure but with different covert grammatical meanings. In the strict sense, ambiguous patterns should be grammatical structural patterns of both the same overt and the same covert grammatical meanings. So ambiguous patterns do not exist on this definition.
520[ ] |a 朱德熙(1980)认为与语法有关的歧义句是由句子的语法结构格式造成的,是句子的语法结构格式有歧义。按这种观点推论,几乎所有的语法结构格式都可能有歧义,那就会导致语法结构格式都是歧义格式的结论,这就相当于取消了歧义格式,出现"歧义格式"悖论。文章对学界所谓的歧义格式分析后认为,学界所谓的歧义格式在做两种语义解释时,有的并不属于同一种显性语法结构格式,有的只是显性语法意义相同而隐性语法意义不同的语法结构格式。严格意义的歧义格式应该是显性语法意义和隐性语法意义都相同的语法结构格式,这样的歧义格式并不存在。只是词类序列相同而显性语法意义不同的两个语法结构或显性语法意义相同而隐性语法意义不同的两个语法结构格式概括不成一个有歧义的(语法结构)格式。
650[1 0] |a Chinese |x Grammar structure
650[1 0] |a 中国人 |x 语法结构
653[0 ] |a Tiếng Trung Quốc
653[0 ] |a Ngữ pháp
653[0 ] |a Cấu trúc ngữ pháp
773[ ] |t 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning |g 2020(03)
856[ ] |u eng.oversea.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbCode=cjfq&QueryID=34&CurRec=1&filename=HYXX202003001&dbname=CJFDLAST2020
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0