TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
Social Consensus and the Meta-Regulation of Land-Taking Disputes in Vietnam

Social Consensus and the Meta-Regulation of Land-Taking Disputes in Vietnam

 Gillespie, John.
 2014
 p.91 - 124 English ISSN: 1559372X
Việt Nam họcNghiên cứu Việt Nam.Land-Taking DisputesMeta-RegulationSocial ConsensusVietnam
Tác giả CN Gillespie, John.
Nhan đề Social Consensus and the Meta-Regulation of Land-Taking Disputes in Vietnam / John Gillespie.
Thông tin xuất bản 2014
Mô tả vật lý p.91 - 124
Tóm tắt Scholars have shown that Vietnam’s authoritarian regime responds to citizens. They speculate that this responsiveness may arise from rules within the party regime, citizen engagement, and a strategy that offers preferential treatment to a narrow group of supporters. This article adds to this literature by showing how intermediaries leverage their personal relationships within the party and state to circumvent formal legal and political hierarchies and broker solutions to complex land-taking cases. It uses ethnographic studies of land-taking disputes to explore the limits of law and legal authority in resolving these disputes and analyze how intermediaries use informal dialogical exchanges to sensitize officials to the needs of land users and to increase land compensation. Dialogue not only resolves misunderstandings and promotes understanding, more importantly it gives the parties a common set of norms and assumptions to work toward. However, such dialogue has not completely succeeded in resolving the complexities of land-taking cases in Vietnam.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Việt Nam học-TVĐHHN.
Từ khóa tự do Nghiên cứu Việt Nam.
Từ khóa tự do Land-Taking Disputes
Từ khóa tự do Meta-Regulation
Từ khóa tự do Social Consensus
Từ khóa tự do Vietnam
Nguồn trích Journal of Vietnamese Studies- 2014, Vol. 9, No. 3
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000cab a2200000 a 4500
00133772
0022
00444179
008150508s2014 enk a 000 0 eng d
0091 0
022[ ] |a 1559372X
035[ ] |a 1456361846
039[ ] |a 20241128110837 |b idtocn |c 20150508163215 |d ngant |y 20150508163215 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a eng
044[ ] |a enk
100[1 ] |a Gillespie, John.
245[1 0] |a Social Consensus and the Meta-Regulation of Land-Taking Disputes in Vietnam / |c John Gillespie.
260[ ] |c 2014
300[ ] |a p.91 - 124
362[0 ] |a Vol.9, No. 3 (Winter 2014)
520[ ] |a Scholars have shown that Vietnam’s authoritarian regime responds to citizens. They speculate that this responsiveness may arise from rules within the party regime, citizen engagement, and a strategy that offers preferential treatment to a narrow group of supporters. This article adds to this literature by showing how intermediaries leverage their personal relationships within the party and state to circumvent formal legal and political hierarchies and broker solutions to complex land-taking cases. It uses ethnographic studies of land-taking disputes to explore the limits of law and legal authority in resolving these disputes and analyze how intermediaries use informal dialogical exchanges to sensitize officials to the needs of land users and to increase land compensation. Dialogue not only resolves misunderstandings and promotes understanding, more importantly it gives the parties a common set of norms and assumptions to work toward. However, such dialogue has not completely succeeded in resolving the complexities of land-taking cases in Vietnam.
650[0 7] |a Việt Nam học |2 TVĐHHN.
653[0 ] |a Nghiên cứu Việt Nam.
653[0 ] |a Land-Taking Disputes
653[0 ] |a Meta-Regulation
653[0 ] |a Social Consensus
653[0 ] |a Vietnam
773[ ] |t Journal of Vietnamese Studies |g 2014, Vol. 9, No. 3
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0