TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
司法裁判中的民主追求——对美国现实主义法学的另一种解读 =

司法裁判中的民主追求——对美国现实主义法学的另一种解读 = : The Value of Democracy in Legal Adjudication A New Understanding of American Legal Realism.

 XIE, Xiao-yao.
 2014
 tr. 135-146. 南京大学 中文 ISSN: 10077278
民主.Social sciences.Common law.Legal formalism.Legal Realism.普通法.法律形式主义.现实主义法学.+ 2 từ khóa
Tác giả CN XIE, Xiao-yao.
Nhan đề 司法裁判中的民主追求——对美国现实主义法学的另一种解读 = The Value of Democracy in Legal Adjudication: A New Understanding of American Legal Realism. /XIE Xiao-yao.
Thông tin xuất bản 2014
Mô tả vật lý tr. 135-146.
Tùng thư 南京大学
Tóm tắt American legal realism claims that judgments should be made case by case in court,and a judge should well respond to the public opinion under the condition of common law,which naturally gets well along with democracy. To better understand the public opinion in a more objective way,a judge should resort to social science methodology so as to strengthen the legitimacy of legal adjudication and the democracy elements of common law. In this regard,the jurisprudence of right offers some criticisms,which,nevertheless,cast no insight into the theoretical appeals of the legal realism and even misunderstand it.
Tóm tắt 在兰代尔倡导的"案例法"影响下,法律形式主义思维在美国的法学界、实务界盛极一时,但这种思维遭到了现实主义法学的批判。在现实主义法学看来,在普通法秩序下,法官裁判并非只是围绕法律规范而展开抽象思维,而是应逐案权衡,考量个案背后的社会现实,并且积极吸纳、回应社会民意,由此,普通法与民主天然契合。法官要在个案裁判中准确客观地掌握和判断社会民意,需在方法上求助于社会科学研究,以此来强化司法裁判权的正当性及普通法的民主要素。对此,权利法学给予了批判,然而,该批判并未理解现实主义法学所型构的普通法、民主与社会科学研究之间理论构造,当然,也就未能真正洞彻现实主义法学所蕴含的理论诉求。
Từ khóa tự do 民主.
Từ khóa tự do Social sciences.
Từ khóa tự do Common law.
Từ khóa tự do Legal formalism.
Từ khóa tự do Legal Realism.
Từ khóa tự do 普通法.
Từ khóa tự do 法律形式主义.
Từ khóa tự do 现实主义法学.
Từ khóa tự do 社会科学研究.
Từ khóa tự do Democracy.
Nguồn trích Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences- 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3.
Nguồn trích 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学- 2014, 第一卷
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000cab a2200000 a 4500
00133851
0022
00444258
008150519s2014 ch| a 000 0 chi d
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10077278
035[ ] |a 1456385772
039[ ] |a 20241202164718 |b idtocn |c 20150519142529 |d haont |y 20150519142529 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a XIE, Xiao-yao.
245[1 4] |a 司法裁判中的民主追求——对美国现实主义法学的另一种解读 = |b The Value of Democracy in Legal Adjudication: A New Understanding of American Legal Realism. / |c XIE Xiao-yao.
260[ ] |c 2014
300[ ] |a tr. 135-146.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 51, No. 3 (Mar. 2014)
490[0 ] |a 南京大学
520[ ] |a American legal realism claims that judgments should be made case by case in court,and a judge should well respond to the public opinion under the condition of common law,which naturally gets well along with democracy. To better understand the public opinion in a more objective way,a judge should resort to social science methodology so as to strengthen the legitimacy of legal adjudication and the democracy elements of common law. In this regard,the jurisprudence of right offers some criticisms,which,nevertheless,cast no insight into the theoretical appeals of the legal realism and even misunderstand it.
520[ ] |a 在兰代尔倡导的"案例法"影响下,法律形式主义思维在美国的法学界、实务界盛极一时,但这种思维遭到了现实主义法学的批判。在现实主义法学看来,在普通法秩序下,法官裁判并非只是围绕法律规范而展开抽象思维,而是应逐案权衡,考量个案背后的社会现实,并且积极吸纳、回应社会民意,由此,普通法与民主天然契合。法官要在个案裁判中准确客观地掌握和判断社会民意,需在方法上求助于社会科学研究,以此来强化司法裁判权的正当性及普通法的民主要素。对此,权利法学给予了批判,然而,该批判并未理解现实主义法学所型构的普通法、民主与社会科学研究之间理论构造,当然,也就未能真正洞彻现实主义法学所蕴含的理论诉求。
653[0 ] |a 民主.
653[0 ] |a Social sciences.
653[0 ] |a Common law.
653[0 ] |a Legal formalism.
653[0 ] |a Legal Realism.
653[0 ] |a 普通法.
653[0 ] |a 法律形式主义.
653[0 ] |a 现实主义法学.
653[0 ] |a 社会科学研究.
653[0 ] |a Democracy.
773[ ] |t Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences |g 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3.
773[ ] |t 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 |g 2014, 第一卷
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0