TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
图绘和民族志早期近代的表现模式 =

图绘和民族志早期近代的表现模式 = : Cartography and Ethnography as Early Modern Modes of Representation

 何, 罗娜.
 2015.
 137-147 p. 中文 ISSN: 10002456
EthnographyCartographyComparative empireComparative historyEarly modernQing frontierSino-European exchange中欧交流+ 4 từ khóa
Tác giả CN 何, 罗娜.
Nhan đề 图绘和民族志:早期近代的表现模式 = Cartography and Ethnography as Early Modern Modes of Representation /何罗娜; 吴雪梅.
Thông tin xuất bản 2015.
Mô tả vật lý 137-147 p.
Tóm tắt This essay argues that the mapping of the frontier during the Kangxi surveys,and the systematic ethnographic descriptions of the native inhabitants of the southwestern frontier,Guizhou province in particular,can be productively understood through the lens of comparative empire formation.By viewing these developments in China in the context of developments in the early modern period internationally we come to see that the Qing empire was an integral part of the early modern world.In short,it explores how technologies of representation that assisted in imperial expansion and rule on the Qing frontier were similar to those used by imperial powers in other parts of the world during a comparable time frame.
Tóm tắt 本文通过一个比较研究帝国形成的视角,以更好地理解康熙年间所绘制的边境地图和对西南边疆(特别是贵州省)土著居民系统的民族志描绘。通过将中国的这些发展置于早期近代的世界中进行研究,可以看出清帝国已是早期近代世界的一个组成部分。与世界其他地方一样,基于观察和数据收集(考证)的科学方法影响了学者和官员理解和记录自然世界及其居民的方式。通过概述民族志和图绘在欧洲和中国的发展,不仅可以论证中国与世界历史发展连接的方式,同时还质疑了欧洲和美国学者关于西欧是现代科学发源地的假设。在由各政府和文化支持机构以及个人奉献与付出的国际背景下,制图科学才得以发展和精进。在研究方法上,则是将世界历史作为一个整体来看待。简而言之,这里要探讨的是,协助清帝国扩张以及边境控制的表现技术,与同时期世界上其他地区的帝国势力所使用的技术是相类似的.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Ethnography
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Cartography
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Comparative empire
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Comparative history
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Early modern
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Qing frontier
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Sino-European exchange
Từ khóa tự do 中欧交流
Từ khóa tự do 图绘
Từ khóa tự do 早期近代
Từ khóa tự do 民族志
Từ khóa tự do 清代边疆
Tác giả(bs) CN 吴, 雪梅.
Nguồn trích Journal of Huazhong normal University.- Vol.54, No.2(2015)
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00137338
0022
00447801
008160303s2015 ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10002456
035[ ] |a 1456407514
039[ ] |a 20241130090116 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160303095452 |z haont
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a 何, 罗娜.
245[1 0] |a 图绘和民族志:早期近代的表现模式 = |b Cartography and Ethnography as Early Modern Modes of Representation / |c 何罗娜; 吴雪梅.
260[ ] |c 2015.
300[ ] |a 137-147 p.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 54, No. 2 (2015)
520[ ] |a This essay argues that the mapping of the frontier during the Kangxi surveys,and the systematic ethnographic descriptions of the native inhabitants of the southwestern frontier,Guizhou province in particular,can be productively understood through the lens of comparative empire formation.By viewing these developments in China in the context of developments in the early modern period internationally we come to see that the Qing empire was an integral part of the early modern world.In short,it explores how technologies of representation that assisted in imperial expansion and rule on the Qing frontier were similar to those used by imperial powers in other parts of the world during a comparable time frame.
520[ ] |a 本文通过一个比较研究帝国形成的视角,以更好地理解康熙年间所绘制的边境地图和对西南边疆(特别是贵州省)土著居民系统的民族志描绘。通过将中国的这些发展置于早期近代的世界中进行研究,可以看出清帝国已是早期近代世界的一个组成部分。与世界其他地方一样,基于观察和数据收集(考证)的科学方法影响了学者和官员理解和记录自然世界及其居民的方式。通过概述民族志和图绘在欧洲和中国的发展,不仅可以论证中国与世界历史发展连接的方式,同时还质疑了欧洲和美国学者关于西欧是现代科学发源地的假设。在由各政府和文化支持机构以及个人奉献与付出的国际背景下,制图科学才得以发展和精进。在研究方法上,则是将世界历史作为一个整体来看待。简而言之,这里要探讨的是,协助清帝国扩张以及边境控制的表现技术,与同时期世界上其他地区的帝国势力所使用的技术是相类似的.
650[0 0] |a Ethnography
650[0 0] |a Cartography
650[0 0] |a Comparative empire
650[0 0] |a Comparative history
650[0 0] |a Early modern
650[0 0] |a Qing frontier
650[0 0] |a Sino-European exchange
653[0 ] |a 中欧交流
653[0 ] |a 图绘
653[0 ] |a 早期近代
653[0 ] |a 民族志
653[0 ] |a 清代边疆
700[0 ] |a 吴, 雪梅.
773[ ] |t Journal of Huazhong normal University. |g Vol.54, No.2(2015)
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0