TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
忠诚呼吁为什么中产阶级偏好协商而非抗争 =

忠诚呼吁为什么中产阶级偏好协商而非抗争 = : Loyal AppealingWhy Does the Middle Class Prefer Negotiation over Resistance in Shanghai?

 熊, 易寒.
 2015.
 22-30 p. 中文 ISSN: 10002456
NegotiationLoyal appealingPolitical per-formanceRightful resistanceThe middle class中产阶级依法抗争协商+ 1 từ khóa
Tác giả CN 熊, 易寒.
Nhan đề 忠诚呼吁:为什么中产阶级偏好协商而非抗争 = Loyal Appealing:Why Does the Middle Class Prefer Negotiation over Resistance in Shanghai? /熊易寒.
Thông tin xuất bản 2015.
Mô tả vật lý 22-30 p.
Tóm tắt "Rightful resistance" has become a mainstream theoretical framework for understanding social protests in contemporary China.However,the middle class in Shanghai is more inclined to protect its rights through"loyal appealing"than rightful resistance.The middle class has had to express its loyalty and its"voice"at the same time to minimize its political risk.Rightful resistance and loyal appealing differ in several respects.First,rightful resistance professes loyalty only to the central government,whereas loyal appealing professes loyalty to the local government.Second,rightful resistance considers the local government an object to confront,whereas loyal appealing considers it a potential ally.Finally,activists who engage in rightful resistance use central government policies as their weapon,whereas activists who engage in loyal appealing use the local government’s political performance as a bargaining chip.However,the middle class has not completely relinquished its right to rightful resistance;instead,rightful resistance is a backup to ensure the effectiveness of loyal appealing.
Tóm tắt "依法抗争"是理解中国民众维权行为的一个重要理论框架。然而,通过对上海J镇的调研发现,中产阶级在维护自身权益时更倾向于采用协商的方式而非依法抗争。中产阶级之所以偏好充满不确定性的协商,是因为迁移成本高昂使他们很难通过"用脚投票"的方式行使"退出权"。为了获得更好的公共服务,他们只能采用呼吁的方式向基层政府施加压力。为了降低政治风险,中产阶级采取有别于"依法抗争"的"忠诚呼吁"策略。依法抗争以中央政府作为忠诚对象,而忠诚呼吁则以基层政府作为忠诚对象;依法抗争以基层政府作为抗争对象,而忠诚呼吁则以基层政府作为潜在的结盟对象;依法抗争以中央政策作为武器,忠诚呼吁以地方政府的政绩作为谈判筹码。但是,中产阶级并未完全放弃"依法抗争",而是将其作为备选方案来确保"忠诚呼吁"的有效性.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Negotiation
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Loyal appealing
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Political per-formance
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Rightful resistance
Thuật ngữ chủ đề The middle class
Từ khóa tự do 中产阶级
Từ khóa tự do 依法抗争
Từ khóa tự do 协商
Từ khóa tự do 忠诚呼吁
Nguồn trích Journal of Huazhong normal University.- Vol.54, No.3(2015)
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00137347
0022
00447810
008160303s2015 ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10002456
035[ ] |a 1456375367
039[ ] |a 20241130090900 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160303102843 |z haont
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a 熊, 易寒.
245[1 0] |a 忠诚呼吁:为什么中产阶级偏好协商而非抗争 = |b Loyal Appealing:Why Does the Middle Class Prefer Negotiation over Resistance in Shanghai? / |c 熊易寒.
260[ ] |c 2015.
300[ ] |a 22-30 p.
362[0 ] |a Vol. 54, No. 3 (2015)
520[ ] |a "Rightful resistance" has become a mainstream theoretical framework for understanding social protests in contemporary China.However,the middle class in Shanghai is more inclined to protect its rights through"loyal appealing"than rightful resistance.The middle class has had to express its loyalty and its"voice"at the same time to minimize its political risk.Rightful resistance and loyal appealing differ in several respects.First,rightful resistance professes loyalty only to the central government,whereas loyal appealing professes loyalty to the local government.Second,rightful resistance considers the local government an object to confront,whereas loyal appealing considers it a potential ally.Finally,activists who engage in rightful resistance use central government policies as their weapon,whereas activists who engage in loyal appealing use the local government’s political performance as a bargaining chip.However,the middle class has not completely relinquished its right to rightful resistance;instead,rightful resistance is a backup to ensure the effectiveness of loyal appealing.
520[ ] |a "依法抗争"是理解中国民众维权行为的一个重要理论框架。然而,通过对上海J镇的调研发现,中产阶级在维护自身权益时更倾向于采用协商的方式而非依法抗争。中产阶级之所以偏好充满不确定性的协商,是因为迁移成本高昂使他们很难通过"用脚投票"的方式行使"退出权"。为了获得更好的公共服务,他们只能采用呼吁的方式向基层政府施加压力。为了降低政治风险,中产阶级采取有别于"依法抗争"的"忠诚呼吁"策略。依法抗争以中央政府作为忠诚对象,而忠诚呼吁则以基层政府作为忠诚对象;依法抗争以基层政府作为抗争对象,而忠诚呼吁则以基层政府作为潜在的结盟对象;依法抗争以中央政策作为武器,忠诚呼吁以地方政府的政绩作为谈判筹码。但是,中产阶级并未完全放弃"依法抗争",而是将其作为备选方案来确保"忠诚呼吁"的有效性.
650[0 0] |a Negotiation
650[0 0] |a Loyal appealing
650[0 0] |a Political per-formance
650[0 0] |a Rightful resistance
650[0 0] |a The middle class
653[0 ] |a 中产阶级
653[0 ] |a 依法抗争
653[0 ] |a 协商
653[0 ] |a 忠诚呼吁
773[ ] |t Journal of Huazhong normal University. |g Vol.54, No.3(2015)
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0