TRA CỨU
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
Tác giả CN Bigus, Jochen.
Nhan đề Optimism and auditor liability / Jochen Bigus
Mô tả vật lý p577-p601
Tóm tắt There is strong evidence that individuals are optimistic in the sense that they underrate the probability of a negative event occurring. This paper provides a positive theoretical analysis of how auditor optimism affects their incentives to take care under two liability rules: strict liability and a negligence rule. Under strict liability, auditors are held liable when they cause damages to investors. Under a negligence rule, auditors are held liable when they cause damages and in addition, act negligently, that is, fail to meet the standard of due care specified in legal and professional rules. I find the following results. (1) If due care is sufficiently close to the efficient level, a negligence rule distorts auditors’ incentives less than strict liability. Under strict liability, optimism makes the auditor overestimate the chances of finding material mistakes and thus induces suboptimal care. (2) If due care is too strict, the auditor will not exert due care but the same level of suboptimal care under either liability rule. (3) With increasing optimism and in the absence of punitive damages, strict liability becomes less preferable to a precise negligence rule. This statement also holds for vaguely defined standards of due care if due care is sufficiently strict or if auditor optimism is sufficiently high. (4) Punitive damages counteract suboptimal incentives generated by auditor optimism, especially under strict liability
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Kế toán-Nghiên cứu-TV ĐHHN
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Tài chính-Nghiên cứu-TV ĐHHN
Từ khóa tự do Bounded rationality.
Từ khóa tự do Optimism.
Từ khóa tự do Punitive damages.
Từ khóa tự do Strict liability.
Từ khóa tự do Auditor liability.
Từ khóa tự do (vague) negligence rule.
Nguồn trích Acounting and business research- 2016, Vol46, N.6
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00141027
0022
00451590
008160905s | a 000 0 eng d
0091 0
035[ ] |a 1456363773
039[ ] |a 20241128110817 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20160905140646 |z khiembt
041[ 0] |a eng
100[ 1] |a Bigus, Jochen.
245[1 0] |a Optimism and auditor liability / |c Jochen Bigus
300[ ] |a p577-p601
362[ 0] |a Vol 46 (Octorber 2016)
520[ ] |a There is strong evidence that individuals are optimistic in the sense that they underrate the probability of a negative event occurring. This paper provides a positive theoretical analysis of how auditor optimism affects their incentives to take care under two liability rules: strict liability and a negligence rule. Under strict liability, auditors are held liable when they cause damages to investors. Under a negligence rule, auditors are held liable when they cause damages and in addition, act negligently, that is, fail to meet the standard of due care specified in legal and professional rules. I find the following results. (1) If due care is sufficiently close to the efficient level, a negligence rule distorts auditors’ incentives less than strict liability. Under strict liability, optimism makes the auditor overestimate the chances of finding material mistakes and thus induces suboptimal care. (2) If due care is too strict, the auditor will not exert due care but the same level of suboptimal care under either liability rule. (3) With increasing optimism and in the absence of punitive damages, strict liability becomes less preferable to a precise negligence rule. This statement also holds for vaguely defined standards of due care if due care is sufficiently strict or if auditor optimism is sufficiently high. (4) Punitive damages counteract suboptimal incentives generated by auditor optimism, especially under strict liability
650[1 7] |a Kế toán |x Nghiên cứu |2 TV ĐHHN
650[1 7] |a Tài chính |x Nghiên cứu |2 TV ĐHHN
653[ ] |a Bounded rationality.
653[ ] |a Optimism.
653[ ] |a Punitive damages.
653[ ] |a Strict liability.
653[ 0] |a Auditor liability.
653[0 ] |a (vague) negligence rule.
773[ 0] |t Acounting and business research |g 2016, Vol46, N.6
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0