TRA CỨU
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
限定系统的功能语言学再描写 =

限定系统的功能语言学再描写 = : Re-describing the finite system from the systemic functional perspective

 522-534+639-640 pages. 中文
Tác giả CN Zhang, Yubo
Nhan đề 限定系统的功能语言学再描写 = Re-describing the finite system from the systemic functional perspective /张玉波; 杨炳钧;ZHANG Yubo;YANG Bingjun
Mô tả vật lý 522-534+639-640 pages.
Tóm tắt Confining the definition of the Finite to the interpersonal metafunction by Systemic Functional Linguistics(SFL)results in the following problems:the Primary Tense/Modality system is defined against its distinction from the Finite,the subjectivity of modality is inconsistently described,the fusion of the Finite with the Predicator is neglected and the finite status of lexical verbs be/have is problematically defined,the Finite in the unrealistic clauses is not adequately covered,and Huddleston’s(1988)query of"Subject responsible for the proposition"is not satisfactorily answered.By a re-description of the Finite system,this paper finds that the Finite helps to build the speaker’s interpersonal subjectivity,construes the degree of participant’s ideational participation by means of construing the involvement degree in the actualization of the process,and foregrounds the textual process.The functions of the Finite require higher grammaticalization and make it necessary to distinguish the interpersonal subject from the ideational subject
Tóm tắt 系统功能语言学当前对限定的功能考察仅限于人际范畴,对限定系统的描写尚存以下疑难问题:[主要时态/情态]系统界定仍有冲突;情态的主客观性界定不一;谓词重合型限定界定上有疏忽,且实义动词be/have限定属性界定存疑;非现实小句限定的界定被忽略;未完全解答Huddleston(1988)提出的与限定密切相关的"主语负责"之疑问。这些存疑要求对限定的功能进行更深入考察,以期从限定的语法本质进行解答。本研究力图对限定系统进行重新描写,以解答上述问题。研究表明,限定在人际上还可构建说话人的主客观身份;在概念上以构建自身介入度的方式构建参与者的参与度;在语篇上可凸显过程;限定的功能对其语法化提出更高要求,区分人际主语与概念主语尤为必要。
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Ngôn ngữ-Giảng dạy-TVĐHHN.
Từ khóa tự do 主要时态
Từ khóa tự do 情态
Từ khóa tự do 限定功能
Từ khóa tự do 限定系统
Từ khóa tự do 系统功能语言学
Nguồn trích Foreign language teaching and research- 2016, Vol 48, N.4
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00143658
0022
00454265
008161025s | a 000 0 chi d
0091 0
035[ ] |a 1456390026
039[ ] |a 20241130170537 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20161025163818 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
100[0 ] |a Zhang, Yubo
245[1 0] |a 限定系统的功能语言学再描写 = |b Re-describing the finite system from the systemic functional perspective / |c 张玉波; 杨炳钧;ZHANG Yubo;YANG Bingjun
300[ ] |a 522-534+639-640 pages.
362[0 ] |a Vol 48 (July 2016)
520[ ] |a Confining the definition of the Finite to the interpersonal metafunction by Systemic Functional Linguistics(SFL)results in the following problems:the Primary Tense/Modality system is defined against its distinction from the Finite,the subjectivity of modality is inconsistently described,the fusion of the Finite with the Predicator is neglected and the finite status of lexical verbs be/have is problematically defined,the Finite in the unrealistic clauses is not adequately covered,and Huddleston’s(1988)query of"Subject responsible for the proposition"is not satisfactorily answered.By a re-description of the Finite system,this paper finds that the Finite helps to build the speaker’s interpersonal subjectivity,construes the degree of participant’s ideational participation by means of construing the involvement degree in the actualization of the process,and foregrounds the textual process.The functions of the Finite require higher grammaticalization and make it necessary to distinguish the interpersonal subject from the ideational subject
520[ ] |a 系统功能语言学当前对限定的功能考察仅限于人际范畴,对限定系统的描写尚存以下疑难问题:[主要时态/情态]系统界定仍有冲突;情态的主客观性界定不一;谓词重合型限定界定上有疏忽,且实义动词be/have限定属性界定存疑;非现实小句限定的界定被忽略;未完全解答Huddleston(1988)提出的与限定密切相关的"主语负责"之疑问。这些存疑要求对限定的功能进行更深入考察,以期从限定的语法本质进行解答。本研究力图对限定系统进行重新描写,以解答上述问题。研究表明,限定在人际上还可构建说话人的主客观身份;在概念上以构建自身介入度的方式构建参与者的参与度;在语篇上可凸显过程;限定的功能对其语法化提出更高要求,区分人际主语与概念主语尤为必要。
650[1 7] |a Ngôn ngữ |x Giảng dạy |2 TVĐHHN.
653[0 ] |a 主要时态
653[0 ] |a 情态
653[0 ] |a 限定功能
653[0 ] |a 限定系统
653[0 ] |a 系统功能语言学
773[0 ] |t Foreign language teaching and research |g 2016, Vol 48, N.4
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0