TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
中国英语学习者词汇联想反应模式相似度研究 =

中国英语学习者词汇联想反应模式相似度研究 = : Exploring the profile proximity of word association response patterns of Chinese EFL learners

 Chen, Peng
 557-568+640-641 pages. 中文
Ngôn ngữ学习者个体反应模式相似度词汇学习词汇联想
Tác giả CN Chen, Peng
Nhan đề 中国英语学习者词汇联想反应模式相似度研究 = Exploring the profile proximity of word association response patterns of Chinese EFL learners /陈鹏； 赵翠莲； CHEN Peng;ZHAO Cuilian
Mô tả vật lý 557-568+640-641 pages.
Tóm tắt 本研究依照Fitzpatrick(2007)的反应词分类标准,通过词汇联想任务对比研究中国英语学习者和Fitzpatrick(2007)汇报的本族语者的反应模式,重点考察了学习者总体和个体反应模式的相似度。结果显示:1)学习者与本族语者的反应模式相比有系统差别,表现为学习者倾向于产出形式关联反应,而本族语者更多产出意义关联反应;2)学习者个体内部的反应相似度显著高于个体之间,说明学习者已形成个性化、差异化的个体反应模式;3)"中间联想"可能的成因有语义、语音、词形、受试误解等因素,隐性表现为一语中介、音形近似词联想等形式。
Tóm tắt
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Ngôn ngữ-Giảng dạy-TVĐHHN.
Từ khóa tự do 学习者个体
Từ khóa tự do 反应模式
Từ khóa tự do 相似度
Từ khóa tự do 词汇学习
Từ khóa tự do 词汇联想
Tác giả(bs) CN Zhao, Cuilian
Nguồn trích Foreign language teaching and research- 2016, Vol 48, N.4
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00143662
0022
00454269
008161025s | a 000 0 chi d
0091 0
035[ ] |a 1456390180
039[ ] |a 20241202152629 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20161025164943 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
100[0 ] |a Chen, Peng
245[1 0] |a 中国英语学习者词汇联想反应模式相似度研究 = |b Exploring the profile proximity of word association response patterns of Chinese EFL learners / |c 陈鹏； 赵翠莲； CHEN Peng;ZHAO Cuilian
300[ ] |a 557-568+640-641 pages.
362[0 ] |a Vol 48 (July 2016)
520[ ] |a 本研究依照Fitzpatrick(2007)的反应词分类标准,通过词汇联想任务对比研究中国英语学习者和Fitzpatrick(2007)汇报的本族语者的反应模式,重点考察了学习者总体和个体反应模式的相似度。结果显示:1)学习者与本族语者的反应模式相比有系统差别,表现为学习者倾向于产出形式关联反应,而本族语者更多产出意义关联反应;2)学习者个体内部的反应相似度显著高于个体之间,说明学习者已形成个性化、差异化的个体反应模式;3)"中间联想"可能的成因有语义、语音、词形、受试误解等因素,隐性表现为一语中介、音形近似词联想等形式。
520[ ] |b By utilizing the word association response categorization established by Fitzpatrick(2007),the study uses word association test-retest to compare the response patterns of Chinese EFL learners and those of native speakers as reported in Fitzpatrick(2007),with special reference to the profile proximity of between-and within-subject responses.The results are as follows.First,there are systematic differences between learnersand native speakersresponse patterns.Learners show apreference for form-based association and native speakers for meaning-based association.Second,in terms of profile proximity,within-subject data pairs are significantly closer than between-subject data pairs.Possibly learners have developed idiosyncratic,individualized responseprofiles.Third,intermediate association may be due to semantic,phonological,formal factors as well as subjectsmisunderstanding.And it may implicitly take the form of L1 mediation,association of phonologically or orthographically similar L2 words,etc
650[1 7] |a Ngôn ngữ |x Giảng dạy |2 TVĐHHN.
653[0 ] |a 学习者个体
653[0 ] |a 反应模式
653[0 ] |a 相似度
653[0 ] |a 词汇学习
653[0 ] |a 词汇联想
700[0 ] |a Zhao, Cuilian
773[0 ] |t Foreign language teaching and research |g 2016, Vol 48, N.4
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0