TRA CỨU
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
汉语领主属宾句的主语转喻还是活跃区? =

汉语领主属宾句的主语转喻还是活跃区? = : The Subject of Possessor-Subject & Possessum-Object Construction in ChineseMetonymy or Active Zone?

 56-65 p. 中文 ISSN: 02579448
Tác giả CN Wang, Liyong.
Nhan đề 汉语领主属宾句的主语:转喻还是活跃区? = The Subject of Possessor-Subject & Possessum-Object Construction in Chinese:Metonymy or Active Zone? /王立永; 韩红建;Wang Liyong;Han Hongjian.
Mô tả vật lý 56-65 p.
Tóm tắt 鉴于汉语领主属宾句和存现句在句法、语义上的相似性,很多学者认为前者是后者的一种引申,前者主语通过转喻指称事件发生的场所。然而,这种转喻说并没有经过严格的论证,而且与领主属宾句的语法表现相悖。在认知语法的基础上,本文认为:1)领主属宾句不是存现的引申句而是一种场景主语结构;2)领主属宾句的主语并没有发生转喻,而是一种显影/活跃区不对应现象。本文的假设既能捕捉领主属宾句与存现句之间的相似关系,又能避免转喻说所带来的问题。
Tóm tắt Based on the parallel in both syntax and semantics between the PossessorSubject & Possessum-Object(PSPO)construction and existential sentence in Chinese,many scholars hold that the former is an extension of the latter,with the subject of the former denoting,through metonymy,the place where the event occurs.However,this metonymy hypothesis has not been vigorously verified,and goes against the grammatical behavior of the PSPO construction.Within a Cognitive Grammar framework,this paper argues that 1)the PSPO construction is not an extension of the existential but a setting-subject construction and 2)the PSPO subject does not undergo any metonymic shift,but involves a kind of profile/active zone discrepancy.The hypothesis of this paper cannot only capture the relationship between the PSPO construction and the existential but also avoid the problem brought by the metonymy hypothesis.
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Tiếng Trung Quốc-Nghiên cứu-Giảng dạy-TVĐHHN
Từ khóa tự do metony my,setting-subject construction
Từ khóa tự do Possessor-Subject & Possessum-Object Construction; existential
Từ khóa tự do profile/active zone discrepancy
Từ khóa tự do 场景主语句
Từ khóa tự do 存现句; 转喻; 场景主语句; 显影/活跃区不对应;
Từ khóa tự do 显影/活跃区不对应
Từ khóa tự do 转喻
Từ khóa tự do 领主属宾句
Tác giả(bs) CN Han, Hongjian.
Nguồn trích Language teaching and linguistic studies.- 2015, No. 3 (173)
Nguồn trích 语言教学与研究- 2015, 第3卷 (173)
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab a2200000 a 4500
00143756
0022
00454363
008161026s ch| chi
0091 0
022[ ] |a 02579448
035[ ] |a 1456381630
039[ ] |a 20241130095950 |b idtocn |c |d |y 20161026103452 |z svtt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a Wang, Liyong.
245[1 0] |a 汉语领主属宾句的主语:转喻还是活跃区? = |b The Subject of Possessor-Subject & Possessum-Object Construction in Chinese:Metonymy or Active Zone? / |c 王立永; 韩红建;Wang Liyong;Han Hongjian.
300[ ] |a 56-65 p.
362[0 ] |a No. 4 (July. 2016)
520[ ] |a 鉴于汉语领主属宾句和存现句在句法、语义上的相似性,很多学者认为前者是后者的一种引申,前者主语通过转喻指称事件发生的场所。然而,这种转喻说并没有经过严格的论证,而且与领主属宾句的语法表现相悖。在认知语法的基础上,本文认为:1)领主属宾句不是存现的引申句而是一种场景主语结构;2)领主属宾句的主语并没有发生转喻,而是一种显影/活跃区不对应现象。本文的假设既能捕捉领主属宾句与存现句之间的相似关系,又能避免转喻说所带来的问题。
520[ ] |a Based on the parallel in both syntax and semantics between the PossessorSubject & Possessum-Object(PSPO)construction and existential sentence in Chinese,many scholars hold that the former is an extension of the latter,with the subject of the former denoting,through metonymy,the place where the event occurs.However,this metonymy hypothesis has not been vigorously verified,and goes against the grammatical behavior of the PSPO construction.Within a Cognitive Grammar framework,this paper argues that 1)the PSPO construction is not an extension of the existential but a setting-subject construction and 2)the PSPO subject does not undergo any metonymic shift,but involves a kind of profile/active zone discrepancy.The hypothesis of this paper cannot only capture the relationship between the PSPO construction and the existential but also avoid the problem brought by the metonymy hypothesis.
650[1 7] |a Tiếng Trung Quốc |x Nghiên cứu |x Giảng dạy |2 TVĐHHN
653[0 ] |a metony my,setting-subject construction
653[0 ] |a Possessor-Subject & Possessum-Object Construction; existential
653[0 ] |a profile/active zone discrepancy
653[0 ] |a 场景主语句
653[0 ] |a 存现句; 转喻; 场景主语句; 显影/活跃区不对应;
653[0 ] |a 显影/活跃区不对应
653[0 ] |a 转喻
653[0 ] |a 领主属宾句
700[0 ] |a Han, Hongjian.
773[ ] |t Language teaching and linguistic studies. |g 2015, No. 3 (173)
773[ ] |t 语言教学与研究 |g 2015, 第3卷 (173)
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0