THƯ VIỆN TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC HÀ NỘI
HANOI UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
THƯ VIỆN TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC HÀ NỘI
HANOI UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
0
Đăng nhập
MENU
Giới thiệu
Đội ngũ cán bộ
Cơ cấu tổ chức
Định hướng phát triển
Tài nguyên và dịch vụ
Lịch sử
Góc thư viện
Ảnh thư viện
Videos thư viện
Nghiệp vụ thư viện
Dịch vụ
Mượn, trả tài liệu
Gia hạn tài liệu
Đặt mượn tài liệu
Đọc tại chỗ
Tư vấn, hỗ trợ thông tin
Cung cấp thông tin theo yêu cầu
Đào tạo người dùng tin
Phòng học nhóm
Tra cứu
Duyệt đề mục
Tìm theo đề mục
Tra cứu nâng cao
Tìm chuyên gia
Tra cứu toàn văn
Tra cứu liên thư viện
Tài liệu theo học phần
Tạp chí
Hỗ trợ
Gửi yêu cầu - Góp ý
HƯỚNG DẪN TRA CỨU TÀI LIỆU
Hướng dẫn - trợ giúp
Hướng dẫn tra cứu tạp chí điện tử
Hỏi đáp nhanh
Tải về
Diễn đàn
Bạn đọc
Đặt phòng
0
Đăng nhập
TRA CỨU
Duyệt đề mục
Tìm theo đề mục
Tra cứu nâng cao
Tìm chuyên gia
Tra cứu toàn văn
Tra cứu liên thư viện
Tài liệu theo học phần
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Tất cả (59116)
Sách (42669)
Sách tham khảo tiếng Việt (5)
Văn học nghệ thuật (4)
Tài liệu môn học (4342)
Bài trích (5935)
Đề tài nghiên cứu (863)
Khoá luận (2778)
Luận văn (1477)
Báo - Tạp chí (426)
Luận án (84)
Kỷ yếu (524)
Bài viết khoa học (17)
Tạp chí (1)
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
Tất cả
Bài trích
From compromise to concept? – a review of ‘other comprehensive income’
Detzen, Dominic.
Pages 760-783.
English
ISSN: 00014788
Financial reporting.
Accounting Standards Board.
Financial Accounting Standard Board.
Mô tả
Marc
Tác giả CN
Detzen, Dominic.
Nhan đề
From compromise to concept? – a review of ‘other comprehensive income’ / Dominic Detzen.
Mô tả vật lý
Pages 760-783.
Tóm tắt
This paper reviews how ‘other comprehensive income’ (OCI) entered financial reporting by tracing major Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) projects that required direct entries to equity and describing recent efforts to make sense of the practice. It was the fixation on net income that brought about departures from all-inclusive income, which were repeatedly made over the years without decidedly devoting attention to developing a conceptual basis. OCI was used as a compromise to incorporate current values in the balance sheet, while retaining historical cost principles in the income statement. When the practice was labeled as OCI, it became institutionalized without a clear meaning. A sense-making of the practice then replaced the debates on the adequacy of using OCI and standard setters have realized that additional layers of theory became necessary to explain, for example, reclassification adjustments. Yet, the IASB has made clear in its recent Exposure Draft of a revised conceptual framework that it does not intend to pursue a fresh start in performance reporting that appears to be needed conceptually. Instead, practical considerations, primarily on International Financial Reporting Standards adoption in Japan, seem to lead to another ex-post rationalization of OCI, this time around a conceptually vacuous use of the relevance characteristic.
Từ khóa tự do
Financial reporting.
Từ khóa tự do
Accounting Standards Board.
Từ khóa tự do
Financial Accounting Standard Board.
Nguồn trích
Accounting and Business Research- 2017, Vol.46, No.7.
Tệp tin điện tử
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
Tag
Giá trị
000
00000nab a2200000 a 4500
001
47143
002
2
004
57801
005
202007060818
008
170227s enk a 000 0 eng d
009
1 0
022
[ ]
|a
00014788
035
[ ]
|a
1456361921
035
[ ]
|a
1456361921
039
[ ]
|a
20241209113612
|b
idtocn
|c
20241209104002
|d
idtocn
|y
20170227155012
|z
huongnt
041
[0 ]
|a
eng
044
[ ]
|a
enk
100
[1 ]
|a
Detzen, Dominic.
245
[1 0]
|a
From compromise to concept? – a review of ‘other comprehensive income’ /
|c
Dominic Detzen.
300
[ ]
|a
Pages 760-783.
520
[ ]
|a
This paper reviews how ‘other comprehensive income’ (OCI) entered financial reporting by tracing major Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) projects that required direct entries to equity and describing recent efforts to make sense of the practice. It was the fixation on net income that brought about departures from all-inclusive income, which were repeatedly made over the years without decidedly devoting attention to developing a conceptual basis. OCI was used as a compromise to incorporate current values in the balance sheet, while retaining historical cost principles in the income statement. When the practice was labeled as OCI, it became institutionalized without a clear meaning. A sense-making of the practice then replaced the debates on the adequacy of using OCI and standard setters have realized that additional layers of theory became necessary to explain, for example, reclassification adjustments. Yet, the IASB has made clear in its recent Exposure Draft of a revised conceptual framework that it does not intend to pursue a fresh start in performance reporting that appears to be needed conceptually. Instead, practical considerations, primarily on International Financial Reporting Standards adoption in Japan, seem to lead to another ex-post rationalization of OCI, this time around a conceptually vacuous use of the relevance characteristic.
653
[0 ]
|a
Financial reporting.
653
[0 ]
|a
Accounting Standards Board.
653
[0 ]
|a
Financial Accounting Standard Board.
773
[ ]
|t
Accounting and Business Research
|g
2017, Vol.46, No.7.
856
[ ]
|a
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1135783
890
[ ]
|a
0
|b
0
|c
0
|d
0