TRA CỨU
Các bộ sưu tập
Skip Navigation Links.
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
建议类虚词“要不”和“不如”

建议类虚词“要不”和“不如”

 周莉
 吉林省延吉市, 2020
 中国 : p.40-52 中文 ISSN: 10037365
Chinese中国人Tiếng Trung QuốcNgữ phápTừ chức năng
Tác giả CN 周莉
Nhan đề 建议类虚词“要不”和“不如” / 周莉, 王静
Thông tin xuất bản 中国 : 吉林省延吉市, 2020
Mô tả vật lý p.40-52
Tóm tắt In the context of Interactional Linguistics, this paper makes a comparative study of the usages of the suggested function words of "yaobu" and "buru". Firstly, by analyzing their differences at different language levels, including discourse structure and sentences forms, we revealed their difference in speaker’s subjectivity: the subjectivity of "buru" is more obvious than "yaobu". On this basis, we analyzed the reasons of their different usages. From the perspectives of diachronic grammaticalization and synchronic semantics, we analyzed that "yaobu" expresses "negative premise" in reasoning and "buru" implies "negative comparison". And they represent different suggested ways respectively: indirect way and direct way. From the perspective of pragmatics, we summarized the pragmatic factors that affect their usages, including "epistemic status", "recipient design" and "entitlement". Finally, we summarized the usage conditions of the function words "yaobu" and "buru" when the speaker implements the speech act of suggestion.
Tóm tắt 本文在互动语言学背景下,对建议类虚词"要不"和"不如"的用法进行比较研究。首先,通过二者在话语结构层面和语句内部形式层面揭示了其在使用上的深层差异——言者主观性差异:"不如"的主观性强于"要不"。其次,对二者的不同用法进行动因分析。从语言内部的历时语法化和共时语义进行分析:"要不"表达了推理中的"否定前提";"不如"蕴含"比较否定义"并以此总结出二者分别代表委婉性和直接性的不同建议方式。从语用角度总结影响二者使用的语用因素:认识状态、受话人设计、权势性。最后,总结出言者表达建议时使用虚词"要不"和"不如"的条件。
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Chinese-Grammar-Using
Thuật ngữ chủ đề 中国人-语法-使用
Từ khóa tự do Tiếng Trung Quốc
Từ khóa tự do Ngữ pháp
Từ khóa tự do Từ chức năng
Tác giả(bs) CN 王静
Nguồn trích 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning- 2020(02)
Tệp tin điện tử eng.oversea.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbCode=cjfq&QueryID=28&CurRec=4&filename=HYXX202002004&dbname=CJFDLAST2020
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab#a2200000ui#4500
00161905
0022
004B3106A58-606F-4376-B88F-BB062547B53B
005202105110935
008081223s2020 vm| vie
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10037365
035[ ] |a 1456383478
039[ ] |a 20241201144903 |b idtocn |c 20210511093512 |d tult |y 20210429083952 |z huongnt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a 周莉
245[1 0] |a 建议类虚词“要不”和“不如” / |c 周莉, 王静
260[ ] |a 中国 : |b 吉林省延吉市, |c 2020
300[ ] |a p.40-52
520[ ] |a In the context of Interactional Linguistics, this paper makes a comparative study of the usages of the suggested function words of "yaobu" and "buru". Firstly, by analyzing their differences at different language levels, including discourse structure and sentences forms, we revealed their difference in speaker’s subjectivity: the subjectivity of "buru" is more obvious than "yaobu". On this basis, we analyzed the reasons of their different usages. From the perspectives of diachronic grammaticalization and synchronic semantics, we analyzed that "yaobu" expresses "negative premise" in reasoning and "buru" implies "negative comparison". And they represent different suggested ways respectively: indirect way and direct way. From the perspective of pragmatics, we summarized the pragmatic factors that affect their usages, including "epistemic status", "recipient design" and "entitlement". Finally, we summarized the usage conditions of the function words "yaobu" and "buru" when the speaker implements the speech act of suggestion.
520[ ] |a 本文在互动语言学背景下,对建议类虚词"要不"和"不如"的用法进行比较研究。首先,通过二者在话语结构层面和语句内部形式层面揭示了其在使用上的深层差异——言者主观性差异:"不如"的主观性强于"要不"。其次,对二者的不同用法进行动因分析。从语言内部的历时语法化和共时语义进行分析:"要不"表达了推理中的"否定前提";"不如"蕴含"比较否定义"并以此总结出二者分别代表委婉性和直接性的不同建议方式。从语用角度总结影响二者使用的语用因素:认识状态、受话人设计、权势性。最后,总结出言者表达建议时使用虚词"要不"和"不如"的条件。
650[1 0] |a Chinese |x Grammar |x Using
650[1 0] |a 中国人 |x 语法 |x 使用
653[0 ] |a Tiếng Trung Quốc
653[0 ] |a Ngữ pháp
653[0 ] |a Từ chức năng
700[0 ] |a 王静
773[ ] |t 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning |g 2020(02)
856[ ] |u eng.oversea.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbCode=cjfq&QueryID=28&CurRec=4&filename=HYXX202002004&dbname=CJFDLAST2020
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0