TRA CỨU
Thư mục - Vốn tư liệu
汉语单双音节对应动词的时空义素研究——以“手”部动词为例

汉语单双音节对应动词的时空义素研究——以“手”部动词为例

 吉林省延吉市, 2020
 中国 : p.92-101 中文 ISSN: 10037365
Tác giả CN 骆健飞
Nhan đề 汉语单双音节对应动词的时空义素研究——以“手”部动词为例 / 骆健飞
Thông tin xuất bản 中国 : 吉林省延吉市, 2020
Mô tả vật lý p.92-101
Tóm tắt This paper examines the differences between monosyllabic and disyllabic verbs from the perspectives of time and space features such as "tools, manners, locations, directions, purposes and causes". The results show that monosyllabic verbs are mostly concerned with time and space features such as "tools, manners". Disyllabic verbs are mostly concerned with "purposes, causes". Different features are reflected in syntactic distance and communicative distance. This paper unifies the space-time feature, communication distance and register. It holds that the space-time features of monosyllabic verbs are close to each other and tend to be informal register, while the space-time features of disyllabic verbs are far from each other and tend to be formal register.
Tóm tắt 本文从"工具、方式、处所、方向、目的、原因"等时空义素的角度考察了单双音节动词的差异,结果发现:单音节动词多关涉"工具、方式"等时空义素,双音节动词多关涉"目的、原因"等时空义素;不同的时空义素又体现在句法距离和交际距离上。本文将时空义素、交际距离和语体统一起来,认为:单音节动词关涉的时空义素交际距离近,倾向口语语体;双音节动词关涉的时空义素交际距离远,倾向正式语体。
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Chinese-Grammar
Thuật ngữ chủ đề 中国人-语法
Từ khóa tự do Tiếng Trung Quốc
Từ khóa tự do Ngữ pháp
Từ khóa tự do Nghiên cứu
Từ khóa tự do Từ loại
Nguồn trích 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning- 2020(03)
Tệp tin điện tử eng.oversea.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbCode=cjfq&QueryID=34&CurRec=9&filename=HYXX202003009&dbname=CJFDLAST2020
MARC
Hiển thị đầy đủ trường & trường con
TagGiá trị
00000000nab#a2200000ui#4500
00161920
0022
0042F22898B-4050-43E4-BF4A-285665A58667
005202105111003
008081223s2020 vm| vie
0091 0
022[ ] |a 10037365
035[ ] |a 1456382783
039[ ] |a 20241130161538 |b idtocn |c 20210511100358 |d tult |y 20210429090715 |z huongnt
041[0 ] |a chi
044[ ] |a ch
100[0 ] |a 骆健飞
245[1 0] |a 汉语单双音节对应动词的时空义素研究——以“手”部动词为例 / |c 骆健飞
260[ ] |a 中国 : |b 吉林省延吉市, |c 2020
300[ ] |a p.92-101
520[ ] |a This paper examines the differences between monosyllabic and disyllabic verbs from the perspectives of time and space features such as "tools, manners, locations, directions, purposes and causes". The results show that monosyllabic verbs are mostly concerned with time and space features such as "tools, manners". Disyllabic verbs are mostly concerned with "purposes, causes". Different features are reflected in syntactic distance and communicative distance. This paper unifies the space-time feature, communication distance and register. It holds that the space-time features of monosyllabic verbs are close to each other and tend to be informal register, while the space-time features of disyllabic verbs are far from each other and tend to be formal register.
520[ ] |a 本文从"工具、方式、处所、方向、目的、原因"等时空义素的角度考察了单双音节动词的差异,结果发现:单音节动词多关涉"工具、方式"等时空义素,双音节动词多关涉"目的、原因"等时空义素;不同的时空义素又体现在句法距离和交际距离上。本文将时空义素、交际距离和语体统一起来,认为:单音节动词关涉的时空义素交际距离近,倾向口语语体;双音节动词关涉的时空义素交际距离远,倾向正式语体。
650[1 0] |a Chinese |x Grammar
650[1 0] |a 中国人 |x 语法
653[0 ] |a Tiếng Trung Quốc
653[0 ] |a Ngữ pháp
653[0 ] |a Nghiên cứu
653[0 ] |a Từ loại
773[ ] |t 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning |g 2020(03)
856[ ] |u eng.oversea.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbCode=cjfq&QueryID=34&CurRec=9&filename=HYXX202003009&dbname=CJFDLAST2020
890[ ] |a 0 |b 0 |c 0 |d 0